Flooring in front of the feed bunk affects feeding behavior and use of freestalls by dairy cows.

In 2 experiments we assessed how preferences, time budgets, and feeding behavior of dairy cows change in response to flooring surfaces in front of the feed bunk. In Experiment 1, 12 nonlactating dairy cattle were individually housed with access to 2 standing platforms filled with either concrete or sawdust. In Experiment 2, 24 nonlactating dairy cattle were given access to either concrete or Animat rubber flooring in front of the feed bunk. In Experiment 1, cows preferred the sawdust to the concrete flooring. In both experiments, cows provided with a softer floor in front of the feed bunk spent more time standing near the feed bunk without eating (Experiment 1: 67 vs. 40 min/d on sawdust vs. concrete, respectively, SEM = 5.6 min/d; Experiment 2: 176 vs. 115 min/d on Animat vs. concrete, respectively, SEM = 20.5 min/d) compared with when they were kept on concrete. The increased time spent at the feed bunk was due to a combination of more frequent eating and standing bouts, indicating that cows were more willing to move on nonconcrete flooring. Total time spent eating was significantly greater on the softer floor in Experiment 2, but not in Experiment 1 (Exp. 1: 289 vs. 275 min/d on sawdust and concrete, respectively, SEM = 7.3 min/d; Exp. 2: 330 vs. 289 min/d on Animat and concrete, respectively, SEM = 15.4), although feed intake was increased on the sawdust treatment in Experiment 1. Cows spent significantly more time lying in the feed alley when the flooring was rubber (219 vs. 53 min/d on Animat and concrete, SEM = 53.6 min/d), perhaps because the lying area in Experiment 2 was inadequate. In conclusion, cows prefer to stand on softer flooring in front of the feed bunk, and are more willing to move on and spend more time standing in front of the feed bunk when provided with softer flooring. These results indicate that cows find softer flooring surfaces more comfortable to stand on than concrete, and highlight the importance of evaluating the comfort of the entire facility.

[1]  J. Rushen,et al.  Preferences of dairy cows kept in unheated buildings for different kind of cubicle flooring , 2002 .

[2]  Thomas Jungbluth,et al.  SOFT WALKING AREAS IN LOOSE HOUSING SYSTEMS FOR DAIRY COWS , 2003 .

[3]  D. Weary,et al.  Bedding on geotextile mattresses: how much is needed to improve cow comfort? , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  C. Phillips,et al.  The Effect of Cubicle and Straw Yard Housing on the Behaviour, Production and Hoof Health of Dairy Cows , 1994, Animal Welfare.

[5]  R. J. Orr,et al.  Dietary preference of dairy cows grazing ryegrass and white clover. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  B. L. Nielsen,et al.  On the interpretation of feeding behaviour measures and the use of feeding rate as an indicator of social constraint , 1999 .

[7]  H. Erb,et al.  Effects of alley and stall surfaces on indices of claw and leg health in dairy cattle housed in a free-stall barn. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  D. Weary,et al.  Designing Better Environments for Cows to Walk and Stand , 2004 .

[9]  E N Noordhuizen-Stassen,et al.  Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  D. Weary,et al.  Influence of neck-rail placement on free-stall preference, use, and cleanliness. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  M. Gaworski,et al.  EFFECTS OF STALL DESIGN ON DAIRY CATTLE BEHAVIOUR , 2003 .

[12]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  Effect of rubber flooring in front of the feed bunk on the time budgets of dairy cattle. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  N. Cook Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. , 2003, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[14]  E. Telezhenko,et al.  Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows , 2005 .

[15]  R. Iman,et al.  Rank Transformations as a Bridge between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics , 1981 .

[16]  M. Hendriks,et al.  Cow behaviour on a new grooved floor in comparison with a slatted floor, taking claw health and floor properties into account. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[17]  C. Phillips,et al.  The locomotion of dairy cows on floor surfaces with different frictional properties. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  W A Weijs,et al.  Frictional forces required for unrestrained locomotion in dairy cattle. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.