Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation

This study compares three configurations of wind turbines to produce a nameplate power of 100 kW applying LCA methodology over a lifetime of 25 years. Alternatives under study are: installing twenty Endurance (EN) 5 kW, or five Jacobs (JA) 20 kW, or one Northern Power (NP) 100 kW turbines in the Halkirk region of Alberta, Canada. The comparison has been done taking life cycle energy, environment and economic aspects into consideration. Each parameter has been quantified corresponding to a functional unit (FU) of 1 kWh. Life cycle energy requirement for NP is found to be 133.3 kJ/kWh, which is about 69% and 41% less than EN and JA respectively. Global warming impact from NP is found to be 17.8 gCO2eq/kWh, which is around 58% and 29% less respective to EN and JA. The acidification (SO2eq/kWh) and ground level ozone [(VOC + NOx)/kWh] impacts from NP are also found significantly less compared to EN and JA configuration. The difference in relative environmental impacts from configurations is found to be less while performing uncertainty analysis, but does not alter the ranking of configurations. At 10% internal rate of return (IRR), electricity price for NP is 0.21$/kWh, whereas EN and JA prices are 65% and 16% higher respectively.

[1]  Brian A. Fleck,et al.  Comparative life-cycle assessment of a small wind turbine for residential off-grid use , 2009 .

[2]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Quality assessment for LCA , 2000 .

[3]  Stefano Pellegrini,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of a 2-MW rated power wind turbine: CML method , 2008 .

[4]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Environmental impacts of micro-wind turbines and their potential to contribute to UK climate change targets , 2013 .

[5]  María Isabel Blanco.  The economics of wind energy , 2009 .

[6]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications , 2002 .

[7]  Francis Meunier,et al.  Life cycle analysis of 4.5 MW and 250 W wind turbines , 2009 .

[8]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[9]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield , 2009 .

[10]  Jim McVeigh,et al.  Wind Turbine - Materials and Manufacturing Fact Sheet , 2001 .

[11]  S. Pellegrini,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine , 2009 .

[12]  Roydon Andrew Fraser,et al.  Application of Monte Carlo analysis to life cycle assessment , 1999 .

[13]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories , 2001 .

[14]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[15]  Robert N. Farrugia,et al.  The wind shear exponent in a Mediterranean island climate , 2003 .

[16]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Application of life cycle assessment to landfilling , 1997 .

[17]  Joseph F. DeCarolis,et al.  The economics of large-scale wind power in a carbon constrained world , 2006 .

[18]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[19]  Scott W. White,et al.  Net Energy Payback and CO2 Emissions from Three Midwestern Wind Farms: An Update , 2007 .

[20]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Energy use in Canada: environmental impacts and opportunities in relationship to infrastructure systems , 2005 .

[21]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Multi-user test of the data quality matrix for product life cycle inventory data , 1998 .

[22]  Liselotte Schleisner,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a wind farm and related externalities , 2000 .

[23]  Paul Gipe,et al.  Wind Power: Renewable Energy for Home, Farm and Business , 2004 .