Testing extrinsic and intrinsic motivation as explanatory variables for the safety climate–safety performance relationship among long-haul truck drivers

The paper tests the proposition that the organizational climate-behavior relationship is based primarily on extrinsic motivation induced by climate perceptions. Using safety climate as exemplar, the effect of climate-induced extrinsic motivation was compared with that of engagement-induced intrinsic motivation on safety behavior and subsequent injury outcomes. Using a sample of long-haul truck drivers representing lone employees, (individual-level) safety climate perceptions and employee engagement predicted safety behavior, which mediated their effect on subsequently measured road injury outcomes. Consistent with meta-analytic evidence suggesting a non-symmetric compensatory relationship between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, high safety climate undermined the effect of engagement on safety behavior with the reverse being true under low safety climate. This resulted in a moderation effect of engagement on the strength of relationship between climate perceptions and safety behavior. Theoretical and practical implications for climate, engagement, and lone work research are discussed.

[1]  S. Clarke.  An integrative model of safety climate: Linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. , 2010 .

[2]  S. Parker,et al.  Designing a safer workplace: importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors. , 2001, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[3]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Marshall Schminke,et al.  Assembling Fragments Into a Lens: A Review, Critique, and Proposed Research Agenda for the Organizational Work Climate Literature , 2009 .

[5]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire , 2006 .

[6]  Scott Mondore,et al.  Safety climate as a mediator between foundation climates and occupational accidents: a group-level investigation. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Organizational Culture and Climate , 2012 .

[8]  Andrew D. Brown.  Making Sense of Inquiry Sensemaking , 2002 .

[9]  Herbert C. Biggs,et al.  Analysis of a safety climate measure for occupational vehicle drivers and implications for safer workplaces , 2005 .

[10]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[11]  Paul D. Bliese,et al.  Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as though They Were Independent , 2004 .

[12]  Jill C. Bradley,et al.  Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  D. Zohar,et al.  A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[15]  Yueng-Hsiang Huang,et al.  Feedback by Technology: Attitudes and Opinions of Truck Drivers , 2005 .

[16]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives' decisions , 2005 .

[17]  Angela Garabet,et al.  Development and validation of safety climate scales for lone workers using truck drivers as exemplar , 2013 .

[18]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. , 1992 .

[19]  Barry Watson,et al.  An exploratory investigation into safety climate and work-related driving. , 2009, Work.

[20]  Sharon Newnam,et al.  Safety in work vehicles: a multilevel study linking safety values and individual predictors to work-related driving crashes. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Jeremy M. Beus,et al.  Safety climate and injuries: an examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Laura M. Stapleton,et al.  A Comparison of Single Sample and Bootstrap Methods to Assess Mediation in Cluster Randomized Trials , 2006, Multivariate behavioral research.

[23]  D. Harrison,et al.  The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice , 1993 .

[25]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[26]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the Unexpected: Complexity as Distributed Sensemaking , 2005 .

[27]  Mervi Ruokolainen,et al.  Job Demands and Resources as Antecedents of Work Engagement: A Longitudinal Study. , 2007 .

[28]  D. Hofmann,et al.  Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Nancy B. Kurland,et al.  A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work , 2002 .

[30]  Michelle R Simpson,et al.  Engagement at work: a review of the literature. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[31]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis , 1983 .

[32]  D. Zohar.  Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Jonathon R B Halbesleben,et al.  The role of exhaustion and workarounds in predicting occupational injuries: a cross-lagged panel study of health care professionals. , 2010, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[34]  Owen Hargie,et al.  Are important corporate policies understood by employees?: A tracking study of organizational information flow , 2007 .

[35]  A. Neal,et al.  A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  Urban Kjellen,et al.  Prevention of accidents through experience feedback , 2000 .

[37]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[38]  Stephen E. Johnson,et al.  The predictive validity of safety climate. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[39]  Yueng-Hsiang Huang,et al.  A mediation model linking dispatcher leadership and work ownership with safety climate as predictors of truck driver safety performance. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  S. Epstein.  The self-concept revisited. Or a theory of a theory. , 1973, The American psychologist.

[41]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  Perspectives on organizational climate and culture. , 2011 .

[42]  Dov Zohar,et al.  Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. , 2011 .

[43]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Climate Formation: Issues and Extensions , 1985 .

[44]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  On the Etiology of Climates. , 1983 .

[45]  Mark A. Griffin,et al.  Safety climate and safety at work. , 2004 .

[46]  S. Clarke.  The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review. , 2006, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[47]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  The Impacts of Telecommuting on Organizations and Individuals: A Review of the Literature , 2001 .

[48]  B. Schneider,et al.  The Meaning of Employee Engagement , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[49]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[50]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[51]  Chia-Huei Emily Ko,et al.  Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research , 2008 .

[52]  W. Scott.  Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests , 2007 .

[53]  Stephen J. Gerras,et al.  Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[55]  A. Kinicki,et al.  Organizational Culture and Climate , 2003 .

[56]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  Vernon C. Hall,et al.  The overjustification effect: A meta‐analysis , 1995 .

[58]  Herbert C Biggs,et al.  Comparing safety climate factors as predictors of work-related driving behavior. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[59]  D. Zohar.  A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Pay and organizational effectiveness : a psychological view , 1972 .

[61]  D. Hofmann,et al.  Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange. , 1999 .

[62]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[63]  William A. Kahn.  Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[64]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[65]  Barry C. Watson,et al.  Can organisational safety climate and occupational stress predict work-related driver fatigue? , 2008 .

[66]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[67]  U. J. Wiersma.  The effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis , 1992 .

[68]  Ido Erev,et al.  On the difficulty of promoting workers' safety behaviour: overcoming the underweighting of routine risks , 2007 .

[69]  A Neal,et al.  Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[70]  S. Stryker,et al.  From Mead to a Structural Symbolic Interactionism and Beyond , 2008 .

[71]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[72]  Carol A. Wong,et al.  Workplace empowerment, work engagement and organizational commitment of new graduate nurses. , 2006, Nursing leadership.

[73]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[74]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[75]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[76]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[77]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[78]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[79]  N. Johnson,et al.  Telecommuting and Virtual Offices: Issues and Opportunities , 2000 .

[80]  Amy B. Rummel,et al.  Cognitive Evaluation Theory: A meta-analytic review of the literature , 1988 .