Temperature variation during high speed incremental forming on different lightweight alloys

Industrial needs are becoming always more complex due to an ever more demanding market and an increasingly fierce competition. Flexibility is, without shadow of doubt, a sought point of strength for improving the company market competitiveness. On this direction, incremental sheet forming (ISF) properly responds to the standing industrial needs. Dimensional accuracy and process slowness are the main drawbacks, which have to be addressed for the growing use of ISF in the industrial scenario. Furthermore, taking into account the current requirements related to the reduction of weights and volumes for fuel saving in the automotive field, lightweight alloys are the materials, which have been always more utilized for the manufacture of several parts. Here, their reduced workability at room temperature has to be taken into account. In this work, high speed incremental forming on lightweight alloys was investigated. The increment of the process velocity was proposed as a possible solution to mitigate the emphasized process limitations. Different ISF conditions were investigated by an experimental plan varying the punch velocity of two orders of magnitude; furthermore, the coil pitch was also analyzed. Finally, the plan was carried out on two different lightweight alloys, an aluminum alloy (AA5754) and a titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), to highlight the impact the different material properties have on the temperature distribution during the process. A wide discussion on the obtained results is reported.

[1]  Giuseppina Ambrogio,et al.  Improving industrial suitability of incremental sheet forming process , 2012 .

[2]  Zequn Zhang,et al.  Formability evaluation of a pure titanium sheet in the cold incremental forming process , 2008 .

[3]  Johan Verbert,et al.  Laser Assisted Incremental Forming: Formability and Accuracy Improvement , 2007 .

[4]  Ghulam Hussain,et al.  Electric hot incremental forming: A novel technique , 2008 .

[5]  Joost Duflou,et al.  Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal , 2005 .

[6]  Guoquan Tong,et al.  Electric hot incremental forming of Ti-6Al-4V titanium sheet , 2010 .

[7]  Nasir Hayat,et al.  The formability of annealed and pre-aged AA-2024 sheets in single-point incremental forming , 2010 .

[8]  Luigino Filice,et al.  Warm incremental forming of magnesium alloy AZ31 , 2008 .

[9]  Jack Jeswiet,et al.  A review of conventional and modern single-point sheet metal forming methods , 2003 .

[10]  A. Camacho,et al.  Investigations on Friction Factors in Metal Forming of Industrial Alloys , 2013 .

[11]  Giuseppina Ambrogio,et al.  On the high-speed Single Point Incremental Forming of titanium alloys , 2013 .

[12]  Jianhua Mo,et al.  Tool path correction algorithm for single-point incremental forming of sheet metal , 2013 .

[13]  Mark J. Anderson,et al.  DOE Simplified: Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation , 2000 .

[14]  He Yang,et al.  Friction factor evaluation by FEM and experiment for TA15 titanium alloy in isothermal forming process , 2012 .

[15]  Jack Jeswiet,et al.  Single point incremental forming at high feed rates and rotational speeds: Surface and structural consequences , 2010 .

[16]  Francesco Gagliardi,et al.  Formability of lightweight alloys by hot incremental sheet forming , 2012 .

[17]  Dieter Schmoeckel Developments in Automation, Flexibilization and Control of Forming Machinery , 1991 .

[18]  S. Castagne,et al.  Superplastic-like forming of Ti-6Al-4V alloy , 2013 .

[19]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for experimenters : an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building , 1979 .