Learning, communicating and eating in local food-systems: the case of organic box schemes in Denmark and Norway

Abstract The present study explores whether organic box schemes can improve learning, communication and food consumption in a sustainable direction. Customers' conceptions and practices in three box schemes operating in Norway and Denmark in 2001 were studied. The study was conducted as a survey including all subscribers in the three box schemes. Three indicators of sustainability were chosen to assess the contribution of local box schemes to sustainable food provisioning. These indicators were: awareness of food-system issues, improved communication and social relations in the box schemes, and changes in food consumption practice. The studied box schemes held the potential of enhancing all the sustainability indicators that were explored in this study. The study indicates that when box schemes are multi-functional, when they focus not only on food distribution but also on providing an arena for learning and actual changes in food practices, they have potential to support the development of more sustainable, local and organic food-systems.

[1]  David Goodman,et al.  Should we go “home” to eat?: toward a reflexive politics of localism , 2005 .

[2]  J. Katz,et al.  The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First , 1998 .

[3]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[4]  H. Moll,et al.  Pursuing More Sustainable Consumption by Analyzing Household Metabolism in European Countries and Cities , 2005 .

[5]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[6]  Rudolf Steiner,et al.  Agriculture course : the birth of the biodynamic method ; eight lectures given in Koberwitz, Silesia, between 7 and 16 June 1924 , 2004 .

[7]  C. Hinrichs.  The practice and politics of food system localization , 2003 .

[8]  C. Leeuwis.  Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension , 2004 .

[9]  Cynthia Cone,et al.  Community-supported agriculture: a sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture? , 2000 .

[10]  Heather Chappells,et al.  The Limited Autonomy of the Consumer: Implications for Sustainable Consumption , 2004 .

[11]  R. Feagan,et al.  Niagara region farmers' markets: local food systems and sustainability considerations , 2004 .

[12]  Hanne Torjusen,et al.  European consumers' conceptions of organic food: A review of available research , 2004 .

[13]  R. Whyte,et al.  An Agricultural Testament , 1941, Nature.

[14]  J. Kloppenburg,et al.  Coming into the Foodshed , 2010 .

[15]  G. Seyfang.  Ecological Citizenship and Sustainable Consumption: Examining Local Organic Food Networks. , 2006 .

[16]  A. Hall,et al.  Organic Farmers in Ontario: An Examination of the Conventionalization Argument , 2001 .

[17]  G. Spaargaren.  Sustainable Consumption: A Theoretical and Environmental Policy Perspective , 2003, The Ecological Modernisation Reader.

[18]  William D. Heffernan,et al.  Opening Spaces through Relocalization: Locating Potential Resistance in the Weaknesses of the Global Food System , 2002 .

[19]  J. Guthman.  The Trouble with ‘Organic Lite’ in California: a Rejoinder to the ‘Conventionalisation’ Debate , 2004 .

[20]  M. Lapping.  Toward the recovery of the local in the globalizing food system: the role of alternative agricultural and food models in the US , 2004 .

[21]  John Hendrickson,et al.  Coming in to the foodshed , 1996, Rooted in the Land.

[22]  R. Feagan.  The place of food: mapping out the ‘local’ in local food systems , 2007 .

[23]  Heather Chappells,et al.  Sustainable Consumption: the implications of changing infrastructures of provision , 2004 .