Authentication of organic and conventional eggs by carotenoid profiling

Organic production benefits from fair competition and sustained consumer confidence. The latter can only be assured by paper trailing and verification assessments. Traditional analytical strategies for guaranteeing quality and uncovering adulteration have relied on the determination of the amount of a marker compound or compounds in a material and a subsequent comparison of the value(s) obtained with those established for equivalent material. Since it is unlikely to find a unique marker that allows discrimination between organic and conventional produce, selective fingerprinting (profiling) combined with chemometrics is a more promising approach. In this study, carotenoid High Performance Liquid Chromatography–Diode Array Detection profiling combined with k-nearest neighbour classification chemometrics was used to predict the production system (organic vs. non-organic) of chicken eggs. A proof-of-concept set (training set for the model) was composed of eggs from 24 organic farms, 12 free range, and 12 barn farms in the Netherlands. The identities of organic, free range, and barn eggs were predicted with success rates of 100%, 100%, and 84%, respectively. The identity of eggs determined using an additional market test set with eggs from 12 organic, 12 free range, and 12 barn farms originating from the Netherlands and New Zealand resulted in correct classifications for 35 of the 36 samples. The results of this study indicate that this fingerprint approach is a promising tool for analytical verification of the production system of organic eggs.

[1]  J. Schlatterer,et al.  Xanthophylls in commercial egg yolks: quantification and identification by HPLC and LC-(APCI)MS using a C30 phase. , 2006, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[2]  Peter F Surai,et al.  Carotenoids in Eggs and Plasma of Red‐Legged Partridges: Effects of Diet and Reproductive Output , 2003, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[3]  K. Miyashita,et al.  Lipid Extraction with Electrolyzed Cathode Water from Marine Products , 2003 .

[4]  N. Akimoto,et al.  Rapid Identification of Carotenoids in a Combination of Liquid Chromatography / UV-Visible Absorption Spectrometry by Photodiode-Array Detector and Atomospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry (LC/PAD/APCI-MS) , 2002 .

[5]  Elizabeth J Johnson,et al.  Carotenoid actions and their relation to health and disease. , 2005, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[6]  P. Weller,et al.  Quantification of carotenoids in chicken plasma after feeding free or esterified lutein and capsanthin using high-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. , 2003, Poultry science.

[7]  P. Petocz,et al.  Fatty acid composition of edible oils derived from certified organic and conventional agricultural methods , 2008 .

[8]  C. Castellini,et al.  Effect of rearing system and season on the performance and egg characteristics of Ancona laying hens , 2009 .

[9]  J. Pickova,et al.  Fatty acid and carotenoid composition of egg yolk as an effect of microalgae addition to feed formula for laying hens , 2006 .

[10]  K. Rogers Stable isotopes as a tool to differentiate eggs laid by caged, barn, free range, and organic hens. , 2009, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[11]  G Cherian,et al.  Fatty acid composition and egg components of specialty eggs. , 2002, Poultry science.

[12]  A. Hidalgo,et al.  A market study on the quality characteristics of eggs from different housing systems , 2008 .

[13]  K. McGraw Interspecific variation in dietary carotenoid assimilation in birds: links to phylogeny and color ornamentation. , 2005, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[14]  G. An,et al.  Effect of polarity on absorption and accumulation of carotenoids by laying hens , 2004 .

[15]  R. Baker,et al.  The role of carotenoids in consumer choice and the likely benefits from their inclusion into products for human consumption , 2004 .