Robot-assisted automatic ultrasound calibration

PurposeUltrasound (US) calibration is the process of determining the unknown transformation from a coordinate frame such as the robot’s tooltip to the US image frame and is a necessary task for any robotic or tracked US system. US calibration requires submillimeter-range accuracy for most applications, but it is a time-consuming and repetitive task. We provide a new framework for automatic US calibration with robot assistance and without the need for temporal calibration.MethodUS calibration based on active echo (AE) phantom was previously proposed, and its superiority over conventional cross-wire phantom-based calibration was shown. In this work, we use AE to guide the robotic arm motion through the process of data collection; we combine the capability of the AE point to localize itself in the frame of the US image with the automatic motion of the robotic arm to provide a framework for calibrating the arm to the US image automatically.ResultsWe demonstrated the efficacy of the automated method compared to the manual method through experiments. To highlight the necessity of frequent ultrasound calibration, it is demonstrated that the calibration precision changed from 1.67 to 3.20 mm if the data collection is not repeated after a dismounting/mounting of the probe holder. In a large data set experiment, similar reconstruction precision of automatic and manual data collection was observed, while the time was reduced by 58 %. In addition, we compared ten automatic calibrations with ten manual ones, each performed in 15 min, and showed that all the automatic ones could converge in the case of setting the initial matrix as identity, while this was not achieved by manual data sets. Given the same initial matrix, the repeatability of the automatic was [0.46, 0.34, 0.80, 0.47] versus [0.42, 0.51, 0.98, 1.15] mm in the manual case for the US image four corners.ConclusionsThe submillimeter accuracy requirement of US calibration makes frequent data collections unavoidable. We proposed an automated calibration setup and showed feasibility by implementing it for a robot tooltip to US image calibration. The automated method showed a similar reconstruction precision as well as repeatability compared to the manual method, while the time consumed for data collection was reduced. The automatic method also reduces the burden of data collection for the user. Thus, the automated method can be a viable solution for applications that require frequent calibrations.

[1]  Eigil Samset,et al.  A motion constrained cross-wire phantom for tracked 2D ultrasound calibration , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[2]  Po-Wei Hsu,et al.  Comparison of freehand 3-D ultrasound calibration techniques using a stylus. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  A real-time freehand ultrasound calibration system with automatic accuracy feedback and control. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Bootstrapped ultrasound calibration. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[5]  Bo Zhuang,et al.  Importance of transducer position tracking for automated breast ultrasound: Initial assessments , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[6]  R W Prager,et al.  Rapid calibration for 3-D freehand ultrasound. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Design and development of an ultrasound calibration phantom and system , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Andras Lasso,et al.  Tracked Ultrasound in Navigated Spine Interventions , 2015 .

[9]  Frank Sauer,et al.  Augmented reality visualization of ultrasound images: system description, calibration, and features , 2001, Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality.

[10]  Laurence Mercier,et al.  A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Rafik Mebarki,et al.  2-D Ultrasound Probe Complete Guidance by Visual Servoing Using Image Moments , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Online ultrasound sensor calibration using gradient descent on the Euclidean Group , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[13]  Gerhard Goos,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2014 , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Ralph Etienne-Cummings,et al.  Active Echo: A New Paradigm for Ultrasound Calibration , 2014, MICCAI.

[15]  Po-Wei Hsu,et al.  Real-time freehand 3D ultrasound calibration. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  John Hossack,et al.  A phantom with reduced complexity for spatial 3-D ultrasound calibration. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  A novel closed form solution for ultrasound calibration , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[18]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  A real-time ultrasound calibration system with automatic accuracy control and incorporation of ultrasound section thickness , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  Emad M. Boctor,et al.  Co-robotic ultrasound tomography: dual arm setup and error analysis , 2015 .

[20]  Ralph Etienne-Cummings,et al.  Active Ultrasound Pattern Injection System (AUSPIS) for Interventional Tool Guidance , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Freehand 3D ultrasound calibration using an electromagnetically tracked needle , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  Andras Lasso,et al.  Improving N-wire phantom-based freehand ultrasound calibration , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[23]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Immediate Ultrasound Calibration with Three Poses and Minimal Image Processing , 2004, MICCAI.