Long-Term Outcomes of High-Risk Keratoplasty in Patients Receiving Systemic Immunosuppression

Purpose: Immunological graft rejection after corneal transplantation remains the leading cause of graft failure. Systemic immunosuppression is used for keratoplasty at a high risk of rejection to improve graft survival. We examined the long-term outcomes of high-risk corneal grafts in patients receiving systemic immunosuppression. Methods: Thirty-five corneal transplants with a high risk of rejection were identified from 29 patients within a regional immunosuppression service in the United Kingdom. Definition of keratoplasty at “high risk” of rejection included one or more of the following: a history of ipsilateral graft rejection and/or failure, 2 or more quadrants of stromal vascularization, perforation or ocular inflammation at the time of surgery, presence of atopy, and a large-diameter (≥9 mm) graft. Median follow-up duration was 5 years after transplantation. Results: Graft survival at 5 years in patients receiving systemic immunosuppression was 73.5%. Rejection episodes occurred in 14 grafts (40%); these episodes were reversible in 10 grafts (71%). Indications for transplantation were mostly visual (n = 19; 54%) and tectonic (n = 14; 40%). Eighteen grafts (51%) had 2 or more high-risk characteristics. Most patients (n = 20; 69%) received monotherapy, commonly with tacrolimus (n = 15; 52%) or mycophenolate mofetil (n = 8; 28%). Three patients (10%) experienced severe systemic side effects. Median “day-to-day” logMAR visual acuity was 0.5 in grafts for all indications and 0.2 for visual indications. Conclusions: Systemic immunosuppression in patients with high-risk keratoplasty seems to improve graft survival with a median follow-up duration of 5 years and is tolerated by most patients. Despite rejection episodes occurring in 40% of grafts, these were mostly reversible.

[1]  J. Shimazaki,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Tacrolimus in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty After Graft Failure With Systemic Cyclosporine , 2014, Cornea.

[2]  D. Larkin,et al.  Sirolimus and mycophenolate as combination prophylaxis in corneal transplant recipients at high rejection risk. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  B. Seitz,et al.  Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) following penetrating high-risk keratoplasty: long-term results of a prospective, randomised, multicentre study , 2009, Eye.

[4]  D. Coster,et al.  The Australian Corneal Graft Registry 2012 Report , 2012 .

[5]  V. Shanmuganathan,et al.  Tacrolimus immunosuppression in high-risk corneal grafts , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[6]  A. Esterman,et al.  How Effective Is Penetrating Corneal Transplantation? Factors Influencing Long-Term Outcome in Multivariate Analysis , 2006, Transplantation.

[7]  E. Mayhew,et al.  Cutting Edge: Atopy Promotes Th2 Responses to Alloantigens and Increases the Incidence and Tempo of Corneal Allograft Rejection1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[8]  Robert W. Thompson,et al.  Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[9]  H. Dua,et al.  Tacrolimus (FK506) in the management of high-risk corneal and limbal grafts. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[10]  E. Godehardt,et al.  Systemic mycophenolate mofetil in comparison with systemic cyclosporin A in high-risk keratoplasty patients: 3 years' results of a randomized prospective clinical trial , 2001, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[11]  R. Dana,et al.  The critical role of lymph nodes in corneal alloimmunization and graft rejection. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  T. Reinhard,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in patients with atopic dermatitis with and without systemic cyclosporin A. , 1999, Cornea.

[13]  G. Tufveson,et al.  Mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation: 3-year results from the placebo-controlled trial. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. , 1999, Transplantation.

[14]  G A Knoll,et al.  Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for immunosuppression in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomised trials , 1999, BMJ.

[15]  H. Mishima,et al.  Involvement of CD8+ RT1.B+ and CD4+ RT1.B+ cells of cervical lymph nodes in the immune response after corneal transplantation in the rat. , 1997, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  J. Woodward,et al.  Peptide-specific T cell clonal expansion in vivo following immunization in the eye, an immune-privileged site. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[17]  J. C. Hill,et al.  Systemic cyclosporine in high-risk keratoplasty: Long-term results , 1995, Eye.

[18]  J. C. Hill,et al.  Immunosuppression in corneal transplantation , 1995, Eye.

[19]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[20]  P. Laughrea,et al.  Risk factors of corneal graft failure. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[21]  D. Roder,et al.  Factors predictive of corneal graft survival. Report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[22]  H. Thiel,et al.  The use of cyclosporine in high-risk keratoplasty. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  D. Coster,et al.  Report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. , 1989, Transplantation proceedings.

[24]  H. Völker‐Dieben,et al.  Hierarchy of prognostic factors for corneal allograft survival. , 1987, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  J. Arentsen Corneal transplant allograft reaction: possible predisposing factors. , 1983, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.