Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension

The parameters of the human memory system constrain the operation of language comprehension processes. In the memory literature, both decay and interference have been proposed as causes of forgetting; however, while there is a long history of research establishing the nature of interference effects in memory, the effects of decay are much more poorly supported. Nevertheless, research investigating the limitations of the human sentence processing mechanism typically focus on decay-based explanations, emphasizing the role of capacity, while the role of interference has received comparatively little attention. This paper reviews both accounts of difficulty in language comprehension by drawing direct connections to research in the memory domain. Capacity-based accounts are found to be untenable, diverging substantially from what is known about the operation of the human memory system. In contrast, recent research investigating comprehension difficulty using a retrieval-interference paradigm is shown to be wholly consistent with both behavioral and neuropsychological memory phenomena. The implications of adopting a retrieval-interference approach to investigating individual variation in language comprehension are discussed.

[1]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Underwood,et al.  An evaluation of two problems of method in the study of retention. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  J. V. Van Dyke Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  J. S. Nairne Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Working Memory Retrieval: Contributions of the Left Prefrontal Cortex, the Left Posterior Parietal Cortex, and the Hippocampus , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Peter A. Tucker,et al.  Primary Memory , 1965, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[7]  Debra L. Long,et al.  The strategic nature of less skilled readers’ suppression problems , 1999 .

[8]  Hamideh Marefat,et al.  Grammaticality Judgment of Garden Path Sentences in Persian , 2008 .

[9]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[10]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies , 1991 .

[11]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  John R. Anderson Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory , 1974 .

[13]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  J. Jonides,et al.  Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[15]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  M. Watkins,et al.  Buildup of Proactive Inhibition as a Cue-Overload Effect. , 1975 .

[17]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .

[18]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[20]  Hiroko Nakano,et al.  The roles of sequencing and verbal working memory in sentence comprehension deficits in Parkinson’s disease , 2006, Brain and Language.

[21]  P. Gordon,et al.  Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .

[22]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  9 – Skilled suppression , 1995 .

[23]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  G Mulder,et al.  Sentence comprehension and word repetition: a positron emission tomography investigation. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[25]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: Building a DOG from a DART, a mop, and a FIG , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[26]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[27]  Alfred Anwander,et al.  Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  D. J. Murray The role of speech responses in short-term memory. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.

[29]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  The Role of Broca's Area in Sentence Comprehension , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  David Badre,et al.  Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  E. Gibson The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[32]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Richard F. Dillon,et al.  Analysis of retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition , 1975 .

[34]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory and Aging: Current Status of the Inhibitory View , 1996 .

[36]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension , 2007 .

[37]  D. Norman,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW PRIMARY MEMORY1 , 1965 .

[38]  Delos D. Wickens,et al.  Encoding Categories of Words: An Empirical Approach to Meaning. , 1970 .

[39]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The Capacity for Generating Information by Randomization , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[41]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  The mechanism of suppression: a component of general comprehension skill. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  P. Gordon,et al.  Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[44]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[45]  John M. Gardiner,et al.  Retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition. , 1972 .

[46]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[47]  M. Manosevitz High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , .

[48]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing , 2004 .

[49]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[50]  Kristen M. Tooley,et al.  Lexical mediation and context effects in sentence processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[51]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Are Representations in Working Memory Distinct From Representations in Long-Term Memory? , 2010, Psychological science.

[52]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Neural Correlates of Syntactic Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension for Low and High Span Readers , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  J. V. Van Dyke Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[54]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Dissociable Controlled Retrieval and Generalized Selection Mechanisms in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[55]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[56]  John Brown Some Tests of the Decay Theory of Immediate Memory , 1958 .

[57]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  The consequences of reduced memory span for the comprehension of semantic versus syntactic information , 1990, Brain and Language.

[58]  B. McElree,et al.  Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  B. McElree,et al.  Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011 .

[60]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[61]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[62]  W. A. Wickelgren,et al.  ACOUSTIC SIMILARITY AND INTRUSION ERRORS IN SHORT-TERM MEMORY. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[64]  Ana Perez-Villalba R.H. Kluwe G. , 2005, Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy.

[65]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Direct evidence for a prefrontal contribution to the control of proactive interference in verbal working memory , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Brian McElree,et al.  Proactive Interference Slows Recognition by Eliminating Fast Assessments of Familiarity. , 2007 .

[67]  J. Henderson,et al.  Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences ☆ , 1991 .

[68]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension : Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources , 2006 .

[69]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[70]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[71]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses , 2010, Cognition.

[72]  Julie A. Van Dyke,et al.  Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair : A retrieval interference theory of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2002 .

[73]  Whitney Tabor,et al.  Speaking Up for Vocabulary , 2007, Journal of learning disabilities.

[74]  Arnold L. Glass,et al.  Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution: Evidence from grammaticality judgments of garden path sentences , 1987 .

[75]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Increases in Intrusion Errors and Working Memory Deficit of Poor Comprehenders , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[76]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  In search of decay in verbal short-term memory. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[77]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The effects of delay and interference: A speed-accuracy study , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[78]  Murray Dj The role of speech responses in short-term memory. , 1967 .

[79]  J. Gee,et al.  Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[80]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[81]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  Memory-Load Interference in Syntactic Processing , 2002, Psychological science.

[82]  Maureen E. O'Neill,et al.  Retrieval Cues and Release from Proactive Inhibition. , 1976 .

[83]  R. Conrad,et al.  Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. , 1964 .

[84]  J. Kimball Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[85]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Finitary models of language users , 1963 .

[86]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[87]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .