Mirrors Improve Rabbit Natural Behavior in a Free-Range Breeding System

Simple Summary The study showed that the use of mirrors may represent a low-cost useful tool to stimulate the expression of natural behaviors when rabbits are bred in small groups in a free-range system. The use of mirrors appeared to simulate the condition in which rabbits were allowed to have visual contacts with the other groups, improving important natural behaviors (olfactory investigation, gnawing, alertness, allo-grooming, stretching, locomotion). This is important in the view of adopting welfare-friendly techniques in rearing of farm animals, since consumers demand for high quality animal products is changing in a way that includes in the concept of home-made products also alternative rearing systems complying with the conditions of welfare. Abstract The aim of this research was to evaluate the possible usefulness of mirrors in improving rabbit behavior in a free-range breeding system. Three groups (each consisting of nine replicates of three animals) were compared: isolated, isolated with mirrors and separated by a wire mesh (possible visual and olfactory contacts). Rabbits allowed to have a visual and olfactory contact showed a significantly higher expression of important natural behaviors (olfactory investigation, gnawing, alertness, stretching, locomotion) compared to the isolated rabbits (with or without mirrors); while rabbits in the mirror group showed higher allo-grooming activity than those isolated and no different locomotion activity than those separated by wire mesh. Thus, mirrors seemed to be able to modify the behavioral repertoire of isolated rabbits by acting on social perception in rabbits reared in small groups in a free-range system. Nevertheless, despite it being advisable to use a combination of different indicators in order to assess the stress level of an animal, the accuracy of serum cortisol, as well as of some secondary stress markers assay, appeared to be limited in this type of breeding.

[1]  S. Keskin,et al.  Evaluation of sensory characteristics of sheep and goat meat by Procrustes Analysis. , 2018 .

[2]  Z. Gerencsér,et al.  Comparison of pens without and with multilevel platforms for growing rabbits , 2017 .

[3]  G. Piccione,et al.  Evaluation of secondary stress biomarkers during road transport in rabbit , 2015 .

[4]  P. Negretti,et al.  Sex effect in mutual olfactory relationships of individually caged rabbits , 2015 .

[5]  A. Trocino,et al.  Behaviour and welfare of growing rabbits housed in cages and pens , 2014 .

[6]  B. C. Kim,et al.  Association of blood glucose, blood lactate, serum cortisol levels, muscle metabolites, muscle fiber type composition, and pork quality traits. , 2014, Meat science.

[7]  P. Janiszewski,et al.  The effect of intensive and extensive production systems on carcass quality in New Zealand White rabbits , 2012 .

[8]  J. Edgar,et al.  The effect of mirrors on the behaviour of singly housed male and female laboratory rabbits , 2010, Animal Welfare.

[9]  P. Negretti,et al.  Short communication: Mutual olfactory relationships in rabbits raised in individual cages , 2010 .

[10]  A. Trocino,et al.  Animal welfare in reared rabbits: a review with emphasis on housing systems. , 2010 .

[11]  G. Zaghini,et al.  ALTERNATIVE PEN HOUSING SYSTEM FOR FATTENING RABBITS : EFFECTS OF GROUP DENSITY AND LITTER , 2010 .

[12]  G. Vignola,et al.  Effects of loading methods on rabbit welfare and meat quality. , 2010, Meat science.

[13]  Z. Gerencsér,et al.  Rabbit preference for cages and pens with or without mirrors , 2009 .

[14]  C. Berri,et al.  Pre-slaughter conditions, animal stress and welfare: current status and possible future research. , 2008, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[15]  Zs.,et al.  Behaviour of growing rabbits under various housing conditions , 2008 .

[16]  Georgia Mason,et al.  Animal economics: assessing the motivation of female laboratory rabbits to reach a platform, social contact and food , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Cjc Phillips,et al.  The effects of mirrors on the welfare of caged rabbits , 2005, Animal Welfare.

[18]  N. Schneiderman,et al.  Circulating levels of glucocorticoid hormones in WHHL and NZW rabbits: circadian cycle and response to repeated social encounter , 2004, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[19]  C. Castellini,et al.  Rearing rabbits on a wire net floor or straw litter: behaviour, growth and meat qualitative traits , 2002 .

[20]  L. Lidfors.  Behavioural effects of environmental enrichment for individually caged rabbits , 1997 .

[21]  A. Lawrence,et al.  A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[22]  J. Gibb.  Sociality, time and space in a sparse population of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) , 1993 .

[23]  P. Koder,et al.  Refinements in rabbit husbandry: Second report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW joint working group on refinement , 1993, Laboratory animals.

[24]  Van Herck.  PERFORMANCES OF WEANED RABBITS RAISED IN PENS OR IN CLASSICAL CAGES: FIRST RESULTS , 2013 .

[25]  V. Bayazit.  Evaluation of Cortisol and Stress in Captive Animals , 2009 .

[26]  P. Negretti,et al.  Mutual visual relationships of rabbits raised in individual cages. , 2008 .

[27]  E. Heinzl,et al.  EFFECT OF HOUSING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT ON PERFORMANCE AND BEHAVIOUR IN FATTENING RABBITS , 2005 .

[28]  J. Jenkins.  Rabbit behavior. , 2001, The veterinary clinics of North America. Exotic animal practice.

[29]  S. D. Jones,et al.  The use of electrolyte solutions for reducing transport stress. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[30]  R. Mykytowycz,et al.  Continuous observations of the activity of the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.), during 24 hour periods , 1958 .