Light sensors for objective light measurement in ambulatory polysomnography

Ambulatory polysomnography (PSG) does not commonly include an objective measure of light to determine the time of lights off (Loff), and thus cannot be used to calculate important indices such as sleep onset latency and sleep efficiency. This study examined the technical specifications and appropriateness of a prototype light sensor (LS) for use in ambulatory Compumedics Somte PSG.Two studies were conducted. The first examined the light measurement characteristics of the LS when used with a portable PSG device, specifically recording trace range, linearity, sensitivity, and stability. This involved the LS being exposed to varying incandescent and fluorescent light levels in a light controlled room. Secondly, the LS was trialled in 24 home and 12 hospital ambulatory PSGs to investigate whether light levels in home and hospital settings were within the recording range of the LS, and to quantify the typical light intensity reduction at the time of Loff. A preliminary exploration of clinical utility was also conducted. Linearity between LS voltage and lux was demonstrated, and the LS trace was stable over 14 hours of recording. The observed maximum voltage output of the LS/PSG device was 250 mV, corresponding to a maximum recording range of 350 lux and 523 lux for incandescent and fluorescent light respectively. At the time of Loff, light levels were within the recording range of the LS, and on average dropped by 72 lux (9–245) in the home and 76 lux (4–348) in the hospital setting. Results suggest that clinical utility was greatest in hospital settings where patients are less mobile. The LS was a simple and effective objective marker of light level in portable PSG, which can be used to identify Loff in ambulatory PSG. This allows measurement of additional sleep indices and support with clinical decisions.

[1]  V. Ninane,et al.  Sleep efficiency during sleep studies: results of a prospective study comparing home‐based and in‐hospital polysomnography , 2011, Journal of sleep research.

[2]  M. Morris,et al.  Auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea after acute quadriplegia (COSAQ): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial , 2013, Trials.

[3]  Miguel A Negrín,et al.  Effectiveness of home respiratory polygraphy for the diagnosis of sleep apnoea and hypopnoea syndrome , 2011, Thorax.

[4]  Toshiki Endo,et al.  Cortical sensory map rearrangement after spinal cord injury: fMRI responses linked to Nogo signalling. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  N. Douglas,et al.  Evaluation of a portable device for diagnosing the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome , 2003, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  Paul J Rathouz,et al.  Self-Reported and Measured Sleep Duration: How Similar Are They? , 2008, Epidemiology.

[7]  S. Quan,et al.  Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. , 2012, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[8]  Ludger Grote,et al.  Validation a portable monitoring device for sleep apnea diagnosis in a population based cohort using synchronized home polysomnography. , 2006, Sleep.

[9]  N J Douglas,et al.  The effect of in-laboratory polysomnography on sleep and objective daytime sleepiness. , 2000, Sleep.

[10]  Paul J. Rathouz,et al.  Sleep duration: how well do self-reports reflect objective measures? The CARDIA Sleep Study , 2008 .