Heuristics, abductions and adaptive algorithms : A toolbox for human decision making

Without the ability to decide and thus give order to a universe - that was originally a chaotic mass of data and phenomena with-out regularity and clear and decipherable structures - the evolution of our species would have been unthinkable. The adaptation to that universe took place on the basis of incomplete and fragmentary information, limited cognitive capacities and narrow time. That scenario selected adaptive behaviors made of fast, imperfect, but highly effective cognitive solutions: heuristics. Although these natural logic tools are commonly studied in cognitive psychology - particularly in the field of judgment and decision-making - their application in Artificial Intelligence and computer simulation of cognition is disclosing prospects for the study of decision-making processes, starting with the classification of alternatives, in search algorithms, to make decisions on the basis of available information. Aim of this paper is to show how this logic is subtended by rules of inference strictly linked to the “natural” way of reasoning. And moreover, how these inferences could constitute, in the wider AI and ICT horizon, the test bench for the development of neural network representation and learning systems for the understanding of human action.

[1]  D. Marocco,et al.  Toward a Machine Learning Predictive-Oriented Approach to Complement Explanatory Modeling. An Application for Evaluating Psychopathological Traits Based on Affective Neurosciences and Phenomenology , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[2]  Antonietta M. Esposito,et al.  The Unaware Brain: The Role of the Interconnected Modal Matrices in the Centrencephalic Space of Functional Integration , 2020, Neural Approaches to Dynamics of Signal Exchanges.

[3]  Anna Esposito,et al.  Decision-Making Styles in an Evolutionary Perspective , 2020, Neural Approaches to Dynamics of Signal Exchanges.

[4]  David Faro,et al.  Behavioural economics , 2019, London Business School Review.

[5]  Alfonso Davide Di Sarno,et al.  Complexity in the narration of the self A new theoretical and methodological perspective of diagnosis in psychopathology based on the computational method , 2019, 2019 10th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom).

[6]  Silvia Dell’Orco,et al.  Preventing dyspraxia: a project for the creation of a computational diagnostic system based on the theory of embodied cognition , 2019, 2019 10th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom).

[7]  Anna Esposito,et al.  Decisions Under Temporal AND Emotional Pressure: The Hidden Relationships Between the Unconscious, Personality, and Cognitive Styles , 2019, World Futures.

[8]  Deborah DiazGranados,et al.  Uncertainty in Decision-Making in Medicine: A Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis of Conceptual Models. , 2019, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  C. Trujillo The complementary role of affect-based and cognitive heuristics to make decisions under conditions of ambivalence and complexity , 2018, PloS one.

[10]  Anna Esposito,et al.  Decision-making Styles and Personality Traits : A pilot study on the predictive capacity of the TCI regarding the quality of the decision , 2018, 2018 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom).

[11]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Cognitive computational neuroscience , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Gregoire Ficheur,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: Bayesian versus Heuristic Method for Diagnostic Decision Support , 2018, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[13]  Raffaele Sperandeo,et al.  When Intuitive Decisions Making, Based on Expertise, May Deliver Better Results than a Rational, Deliberate Approach , 2018, Multidisciplinary Approaches to Neural Computing.

[14]  Ulrich Hoffrage,et al.  The fast-and-frugal heuristics program , 2017 .

[15]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning , 2017 .

[16]  Robert C. Richardson Heuristics and Satisficing , 2017 .

[17]  Gábor Kiss,et al.  Comparison of read and spontaneous speech in case of automatic detection of depression , 2017, 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom).

[18]  Anna Esposito,et al.  Neuronal symphonies: Musical improvisation and the centrencephalic space of functional integration , 2017 .

[19]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on , 2017, The Lancet.

[20]  B. Markey-Towler I, Roboticus Oeconomicus: the philosophy of mind in economics, and why it matters , 2017 .

[21]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Applied decision making with fast-and-frugal heuristics , 2016 .

[22]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Towards a Rational Theory of Heuristics , 2016 .

[23]  Anna Esposito,et al.  On the Significance of Speech Pauses in Depressive Disorders: Results on Read and Spontaneous Narratives , 2016, Recent Advances in Nonlinear Speech Processing.

[24]  Mauro Maldonato,et al.  Adaptive and Evolutive Algorithms: A Natural Logic for Artificial Mind , 2016, Toward Robotic Socially Believable Behaving Systems.

[25]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The power of simplicity: a fast-and-frugal heuristics approach to performance science , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[26]  Mauro Maldonato,et al.  Making Decisions under Uncertainty Emotions, Risk and Biases , 2015, Advances in Neural Networks.

[27]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[28]  Guilherme Del Fiol,et al.  Heuristics in Managing Complex Clinical Decision Tasks in Experts' Decision Making , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics.

[29]  M. Tschaepe Guessing and Abduction , 2014 .

[30]  Mauro Maldonato,et al.  The Natural Logic of Action , 2013 .

[31]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  Perceptual load in sport and the heuristic value of the perceptual load paradigm in examining expertise-related perceptual-cognitive adaptations , 2012, Cognitive Processing.

[32]  Lisa Boily History of Economic Thought , 2012 .

[33]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making in medicine , 2012, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[34]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  The Recognition Heuristic: A Review of Theory and Tests , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[35]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  M. Maldonato,et al.  Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Rationality , 2010 .

[37]  T. S. Hilbert,et al.  Example-Based Learning in Heuristic Domains: A Cognitive Load Theory Account , 2009 .

[38]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[39]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  One-reason decision-making: Modeling violations of expected utility theory , 2008 .

[40]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Why Heuristics Work , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[41]  G. Gigerenzer Why does framing influence judgment? , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[42]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics in medical decision making , 2005 .

[43]  P. Campbell How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method , 2005 .

[44]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  E. Salas,et al.  Taking stock of naturalistic decision making , 2001 .

[46]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  The adaptive toolbox: toward a darwinian rationality. , 2001, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[47]  P M Todd,et al.  Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[48]  Herbert A. Simon Barriers and bounds to Rationality , 2000 .

[49]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[50]  H. Simon Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason , 1997 .

[51]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Bounded Rationality : Models of Fast and Frugal Inference , 1997 .

[52]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[53]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .

[54]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[55]  R. Tietz,et al.  Semi-normative theories based on bounded rationality , 1992 .

[56]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Decision models: some lessons from the field , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[57]  M. Wertheimer A Gestalt perspective on computer simulations of cognitive processes , 1985 .

[58]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Search and Reasoning in Problem Solving , 1983, Artif. Intell..

[59]  Heinz von Foerster,et al.  To Know and to Let Know: An Applied Theory of Knowledge. , 1982 .

[60]  A. Tversky,et al.  Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[61]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[62]  Thomas G. West,et al.  Plato's Apology of Socrates: An Interpretation, With a New Translation , 1979 .

[63]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations , 1978 .

[64]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory. An Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk , 1977 .

[65]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[66]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[67]  Allen Newell,et al.  Heuristic Problem Solving: The Next Advance in Operations Research , 1958 .