Principles and Practices of Robust, Photography-based Digital Imaging Techniques for Museums

This full day tutorial will use lectures and demonstrations from leading researchers and museum practitioners to present the principles and practices for robust photography-based digital techniques in museum contexts. The tutorial will present many examples of existing and cutting-edge uses of photography-based imaging including Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI), Algorithmic Rendering (AR), camera calibration, and methods of imaged-based generation of textured 3D geometry. The tutorial will also explore a framework for Leading museums are now adopting the more mature members of this family of robust digital imaging practices. These practices are part of the emerging science known as Computational Photography (CP). The imaging family’s common feature is the purpose-driven selective extraction of information from sequences of standard digital photographs. The information is extracted from the photographic sequences by computer algorithms. The extracted information is then integrated into a new digital representations containing knowledge not present in the original photogs, examined either alone or sequentially. The tutorial will examine strategies that promote widespread museum adoption of empirical acquisition technologies, generate scientifically reliable digital representations that are ‘born archival’, assist this knowledge’s long-term digital preservation, enable its future reuse for novel purposes, aid the physical conservation of the digitally represented museum materials, and enable public access and research.

[1]  Mark Mudge,et al.  G rass-roots Imaging: A Case-study in Sustainable Heritage Documentation at Chersonesos, Ukraine , 2009 .

[2]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  MeshLab: an Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool , 2008, Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference.

[4]  Peter Krogh The DAM Book: Digital Asset Management for Photographers (O'Reilly Digital Studio) , 2005 .

[5]  Tim Weyrich,et al.  Multi-feature matching of fresco fragments , 2010, ACM Trans. Graph..

[6]  Tim Weyrich,et al.  A system for high-volume acquisition and matching of fresco fragments: reassembling Theran wall paintings , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[7]  Bruce Gooch,et al.  Non-photorealistic rendering , 2001 .

[8]  Kurt D. Bollacker,et al.  Avoiding a Digital Dark Age , 2010 .

[9]  Michael Goesele,et al.  Multi-View Stereo for Community Photo Collections , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  Maarten Vergauwen,et al.  Web-based 3D Reconstruction Service , 2006, Machine Vision and Applications.

[11]  Thomas Malzbender,et al.  Optimized image sampling for view and light interpolation , 2009, VAST'09.

[12]  Martin Doerr,et al.  Image-Based Empirical Information Acquisition, Scientific Reliability, and Long-Term Digital Preservation for the Natural Sciences and Cultural Heritage , 2008, Eurographics.

[13]  Mark Mudge,et al.  Reflection Transformation Imaging and Virtual Representations of Coins from the Hospice of the Grand St. Bernard , 2005, VAST.

[14]  Kirk Martinez,et al.  Archaeological applications of polynomial texture mapping: analysis, conservation and representation , 2010 .

[15]  Steven M. Seitz,et al.  Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3D , 2006, ACM Trans. Graph..

[16]  Hembo Pagi,et al.  Polynomial texture mapping and related imaging technologies for the recording, analysis and presentation of archaeological materials , 2010 .

[17]  D. Scharstein,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Stereo and Multi-Baseline Vision (SMBV 2001).

[18]  Szymon Rusinkiewicz,et al.  Exaggerated shading for depicting shape and detail , 2006, SIGGRAPH 2006.

[19]  Robert J. Woodham,et al.  Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images , 1980 .

[20]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  SpiderGL: a JavaScript 3D graphics library for next-generation WWW , 2010, Web3D '10.

[21]  Thomas Malzbender,et al.  New Reflection Transformation Imaging Methods for Rock Art and Multiple-Viewpoint Display , 2006, VAST.

[22]  Ruth Tringham,et al.  Last House on the Hill: Digitally remediating data and media for preservation and access , 2011, JOCCH.

[23]  Martin Doerr,et al.  Modeling and querying provenance by extending CIDOC CRM , 2010, Distributed and Parallel Databases.

[24]  Szymon Rusinkiewicz,et al.  Illustration of complex real-world objects using images with normals , 2007, NPAR '07.

[25]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  High Quality PTM Acquisition: Reflection Transformation Imaging for Large Objects , 2006, VAST.

[26]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  Dynamic shading enhancement for reflectance transformation imaging , 2010, JOCCH.

[27]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Accurate, Dense, and Robust Multiview Stereopsis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  Martin Doerr,et al.  The dream of a global knowledge network—A new approach , 2008, JOCCH.

[29]  Matthew A. Brown,et al.  Unsupervised 3D object recognition and reconstruction in unordered datasets , 2005, Fifth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM'05).

[30]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Efficient Graph-Based Image Segmentation , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  Thomas Malzbender,et al.  Surface enhancement using real-time photometric stereo and reflectance transformation , 2006, EGSR '06.

[32]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Bilateral filtering for gray and color images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[33]  Neffra A. Matthews,et al.  Aerial and close-range photogrammetric technology : , 2008 .

[34]  Thomas Malzbender,et al.  Polynomial texture maps , 2001, SIGGRAPH.