Coordination Begins at Home: Measuring Coordination Complementarities in Supply Chain Environments

This research-in-progress presents a framework, grounded in Coordination theory (Thompson, 1967), to examine coordination as a complementary investment to the business value of Supply Chain Management (SCM) environments. Given that one of the objectives of a SCM is to reduce transaction costs, including coordination costs, this framework proposes that for supply chains to prosper, the technology must support the appropriate inter- and intra-organizational coordination mechanisms. We propose using scenario analysis to measure the information technology payoff in a firm by measuring the appropriateness of its coordination mechanism.

[1]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment , 2001 .

[2]  Powell E. Robinson,et al.  Flow Coordination and Information Sharing in Supply Chains: Review, Implications, and Directions for Future Research , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[3]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? , 1990, CSCW '90.

[4]  James S. Keebler,et al.  Keeping Score: Measuring the Business Value of Logistics in the Supply Chain , 1999 .

[5]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Causes of Failure in Network Organizations , 1992 .

[6]  Nukala Viswanadham,et al.  Partner selection and synchronized planning in dynamic manufacturing networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Aligning supply chain management characteristics and interorganizational information system types: an exploratory study , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[8]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[9]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Emerging Electronic Partnerships: Antecedents and Dimensions of EDI Use from the Supplier's Perspective , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  George M. Wyner,et al.  The role of coordination and architecture in supporting ASP business models , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Measuring supply chain performance , 1999 .

[12]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The "Move to the Middle" Hypothesis , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo,et al.  Analysis of information flows to enhance the coordination of production processes , 2002 .

[14]  M. Bensaou,et al.  Buyer-Supplier Relations in Industrial Markets: When Do Buyers Risk Making Idiosyncratic Investments? , 1999 .

[15]  G. Prem Premkumar,et al.  Interorganization Systems and Supply Chain Management: An Information Processing Perspective , 2000, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[16]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[17]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes , 1999 .

[18]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[19]  Togar M. Simatupang,et al.  The knowledge of coordination for supply chain integration , 2002, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[20]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[21]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Software Project Coordination , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Judy E. Scott.  The FoxMeyer Drugs' Bankruptcy: Was it a Failure of ERP? , 1999 .

[23]  Sarma R. Nidumolu.  A Comparison of the Structural Contingency and Risk-Based Perspectives on Coordination in Software Development Projects , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  S. Vickery,et al.  Supply Chain Flexibility: An Empirical Study , 1999 .

[25]  M. Christopher,et al.  Measuring agile capabilities in the supply chain , 2001 .

[26]  Sarma R. Nidumolu.  The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Ben M. Bensaou,et al.  Inter-organizational relationships and information technology: a conceptual synthesis and a research framework , 1996 .

[28]  R. V. Landeghem,et al.  Benchmarking of logistical operations based on a causal model. , 2001 .

[29]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  A Coordination Theory Approach to Organizational Process Design , 1997 .

[30]  Jane S. Webster,et al.  Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two polic , 1995 .

[31]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[32]  L. Christman.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1977 .

[33]  S. New.  A framework for analysing supply chain improvement , 1996 .

[34]  Sheldon Zedeck,et al.  An information processing model and approach to the study of motivation , 1977 .

[35]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Toward a handbook of organizational processes , 2000 .

[36]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[37]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1974 .

[38]  Hee-Woong Kim,et al.  Business Process Versus Coordination Process in Organizational Change , 2000 .