Multimedia and Hypermedia Solutions for Promoting Metacognitive Engagement, Coherence, and Learning

Users of educational hypertext are faced with the challenge of creating meaning both within and between texts. Cohesion is an important factor contributing to whether a reader is able to capture meaning and comprehend text. When readers are required to fill in conceptual gaps in text, comprehension can fail if they do not have sufficient knowledge. Cohesion helps low-knowledge readers to create a more coherent mental representation of the text. However, text that is too cohesive can inhibit active processing, and thus reduce coherence for more knowledgeable readers. Similar patterns have been found for hypertext, which requires readers to create coherence between multiple electronic texts. Domain novices are in greater need of explicit pointers to important links between documents and gain from having less control over system navigation. Domain experts are in less need of scaffolding within the system. We discuss the use of a multimedia reading strategy training program to help low-knowledge readers better understand less cohesive text. Finally, we discuss four principles to guide hypertext development geared toward improving coherence and metacognitive engagement.

[1]  B. Davey,et al.  Think Aloud--Modeling the Cognitive Processes or Reading Comprehension. , 1983 .

[2]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  The Relevance of Hierarchies to Learning Biology From Hypertext , 1999 .

[3]  James F. Baumann,et al.  Effect of Think-Aloud Instruction on Elementary Students' Comprehension Monitoring Abilities , 1992 .

[4]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[5]  Roy Rada,et al.  Interacting With Hypertext: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Reading Strategy Training: Automated Verses Live , 2004 .

[7]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[8]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  iStart: A Web-Based Reading Strategy Intervention That Improves Students's Science Comprehension , 2004, CELDA.

[9]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[10]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Learner-centered design: the challenge for HCI in the 21st century , 1994, INTR.

[11]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  The matters that really matter for hypertext usability , 1989, Hypertext.

[12]  Deborah J. Trumbull.  Students’ Actual and Perceived Use of Navigational and Guidance Tools in a Hypermedia Program , 1992 .

[13]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Assessing Reading Skill With a Think-Aloud Procedure and Latent Semantic Analysis , 2003 .

[14]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled comprehenders , 1988 .

[15]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  LEARNING FROM HYPERTEXT: RESEARCH ISSUES AND FINDINGS , 2004 .

[16]  Judith Orasanu,et al.  Reading Comprehension: From Research to Practice. , 1986 .

[17]  Michael J. Wenger,et al.  Comprehension and retention of nonlinear text : Considerations of working memory and material-appropriate processing , 1996 .

[18]  Katja Wiemer-Hastings,et al.  Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[19]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  How Including Prior Knowledge As a Subject Variable May Change Outcomes of Learning Research , 2004 .

[20]  M. Chi,et al.  The Content of Physics Self-Explanations , 1991 .

[21]  J. Oakhill.  INFERENTIAL AND MEMORY SKILLS IN CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSION OF STORIES , 1984 .

[22]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[23]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Revising Social Studies Text from a Text-Processing Perspective: Evidence of Improved Comprehensibility. , 1991 .

[24]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[25]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. , 1994 .

[26]  Joel C. Walz.  Reading Hypertext: Higher-Level Processes , 2001 .

[27]  D. McNamara.  SERT: Self-Explanation Reading Training , 2004 .

[28]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. , 1991 .

[29]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Processing in Human Memory , 1979 .

[30]  D. McNamara.  Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[31]  Douglas Kauffman.  Self-Regulated Learning in Web-Based Environments: Instructional Tools Designed to Facilitate Cognitive Strategy Use, Metacognitive Processing, and Motivational Beliefs , 2004 .

[32]  M. Lundeberg,et al.  Metacognitive Aspects of Reading Comprehension: Studying Understanding in Legal Case Analysis. , 1987 .

[33]  Catherine Snow,et al.  Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension , 2002 .

[34]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[35]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Hypermedia: functional features and research issues , 1991 .

[36]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia , 2000 .

[37]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Learning from Examples Via Self-Explanations , 1988, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[38]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Learning From Social Studies Texts , 1989 .

[39]  Max M. Louwerse,et al.  10. Computational retrieval of themes , 2002 .

[40]  Richard Cox,et al.  Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[41]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[42]  J. M. Golding,et al.  Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? , 1993 .

[43]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[44]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  A model of the self-explanation effect. , 1992 .

[45]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation , 1998 .

[46]  Wayne L. Shebilske,et al.  Observation versus Hands-on Practice of Complex Skills in Dyadic, Triadic, and Tetradic Training-Teams , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[47]  Gloria E. Melara,et al.  Investigating Learning Styles on Different Hypertext Environments: Hierarchical-like and Network-like Structures , 1996 .

[48]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Working‐memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension , 1991 .

[49]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Reading Strategies and Hypertext Comprehension , 2005 .

[50]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[52]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Learning From Text: A Multidimensional and Developmental Perspective , 2000 .

[53]  Murray Singer,et al.  Individual differences in bridging inference processes , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[54]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Using Hypertext to Study and Reason About Historical Evidence , 1996 .

[55]  J. Oakhill,et al.  Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[56]  James F. Voss,et al.  Star Wars: A developmental study of expert and novice knowledge structures , 1985 .

[57]  E. R. Steinberg.  Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977–1988 , 1989 .

[58]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence , 1996 .

[59]  Laura M. Leventhal,et al.  Empirically-based re-design of a hypertext encyclopedia , 1993, CHI '93.

[60]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. , 2001 .

[61]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Self-Explanation Reading Training: Effects for Low-Knowledge Readers , 2004 .

[62]  Louis M. Gomez,et al.  Formative design evaluation of superbook , 1989, TOIS.

[63]  G. Hanley.  e‐Learning and the Science of Instruction , 2004 .

[64]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  The Relationship between Prior Knowledge and Interactive Overviews during Hypermedia-Aided Learning , 1999 .

[65]  Cliff McKnight,et al.  Navigation in Hypertext: Structural Cues and Mental Maps , 1989, UK Hypertext.

[66]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[67]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  The Long-Term Retention of Training and Instruction , 1996 .

[68]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[69]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Understanding of causal expressions in skilled and less skilled text comprehenders , 1990 .

[70]  Murray Singer,et al.  The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[71]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Strategic processing during comprehension. , 1999 .

[72]  C. Bereiter,et al.  Use of Thinking Aloud in Identification and Teaching of Reading Comprehension Strategies , 1985 .

[73]  P. David Pearson,et al.  An Instructional Study: Improving the Inferential Comprehension of Good and Poor Fourth-Grade Readers. , 1983 .

[74]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse , 1982, Cognition.

[75]  Marshall J. Farr,et al.  The Long-Term Retention of Knowledge and Skills , 1987 .

[76]  George J. Spilich,et al.  Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. , 1979 .

[77]  Heidi L. Schnackenberg,et al.  Learner control over full and lean computer-based instruction under differing ability levels , 2000 .

[78]  Peter Dewitz,et al.  Effects of Inference Training on Comprehension and Comprehension Monitoring. , 1987 .

[79]  Alison H. Paris,et al.  Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning , 2001 .

[80]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  Promoting Active Learning: The Role of System Structure in Learning From Hypertext , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[81]  Betsy A. Bowen,et al.  Four Puzzles in Adult Literacy: Reflections on the National Adult Literacy Survey , 1999 .

[82]  Jane Oakhill.  Instantiation in Skilled and Less Skilled Comprehenders , 1983 .

[83]  Seong-Soo Lee,et al.  Effects of Learner-Control versus Program-Control Strategies on Computer-Aided Learning of Chemistry Problems: For Acquisition or Review?. , 1991 .

[84]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  The Contribution of Prior Knowledge and Coherent Text to Comprehension , 1992 .

[85]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Changes in Reading Strategies as a Function of Reading Training: A Comparison of Live and Computerized Training , 2005 .

[86]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Inherent details in self-regulated learning , 1995 .

[87]  A. Graesser,et al.  Need to Learn in Order to Process Coherence Relations in Narrative and Expository Text ? , 2002 .

[88]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Overhearing Dialogues and Monologues in Virtual Tutoring Sessions: Effects on Questioning and Vicarious Learning , 2000 .