The unassisted visual system on earth and in space.

Chuck Oman has been a guide and mentor for research in human perception and performance during space exploration for over 25 years. His research has provided a solid foundation for our understanding of how humans cope with the challenges and ambiguities of sensation and perception in space. In many of the environments associated with work in space the human visual system must operate with unusual combinations of visual and other perceptual cues. On Earth physical acceleration cues are normally available to assist the visual system in interpreting static and dynamic visual features. Here we consider two cases where the visual system is not assisted by such cues. Our first experiment examines perceptual stability when the normally available physical cues to linear acceleration are absent. Our second experiment examines perceived orientation when there is no assistance from the physically sensed direction of gravity. In both cases the effectiveness of vision is paradoxically reduced in the absence of physical acceleration cues. The reluctance to rely heavily on vision represents an important human factors challenge to efficient performance in the space environment.

[1]  W. H. Ittelson,et al.  The size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1953, Psychological review.

[2]  A. J. Benson,et al.  European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 4. Thresholds of perception of whole-body linear oscillation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Horst Mittelstaedt Subjective vertical in weightlessness , 1985 .

[4]  S Glasauer,et al.  Perception of spatial orientation in different g-levels. , 1997, Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology.

[5]  Nuo Li,et al.  Updating Visual Space during Motion in Depth , 2005, Neuron.

[6]  M. Wexler,et al.  Movement prediction and movement production. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[8]  M. Corballis,et al.  Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[9]  I. Rock The orientation of forms on the retina and in the environment. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  C Oman Why do astronauts suffer space sickness? , 1984, New scientist.

[11]  Faisal Karmali,et al.  Mental own-body and body-part transformations in microgravity. , 2007, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[12]  Vincent P. Ferrera,et al.  Estimating invisible target speed from neuronal activity in monkey frontal eye field , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Andrew Hogue,et al.  Growing IVY: Building the Immersive Visual environment at York , 2001 .

[14]  L. Harris,et al.  The subjective visual vertical and the perceptual upright , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  T. Mergner,et al.  Updating the Location of Visual Objects in Space Following Vestibular Stimulation , 1999 .

[16]  Charles M. Oman,et al.  Human Visual Orientation in Weightlessness , 2003 .

[17]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[18]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Human visuospatial updating after passive translations in three-dimensional space. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Charles M. Oman,et al.  Spatial orientation and navigation in microgravity , 2007 .

[20]  H L Jenkin,et al.  Effect of field of view on the levitation illusion. , 2007, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[21]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Visuo-vestibular interaction in the reconstruction of travelled trajectories , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Deficits and recovery in visuospatial memory during head motion after bilateral labyrinthine lesion. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  C. Oman,et al.  M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 4. Space motion sickness: symptoms, stimuli, and predictability , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  L. Harris,et al.  The effect of altered gravity states on the perception of orientation , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Additivity of Retinal and Pursuit Velocity in the Perceptions of Depth and Rigidity from Object-Produced Motion Parallax , 2007, Perception.

[26]  L. Young,et al.  A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[27]  F. Mast,et al.  Spatial processing in navigation, imagery and perception , 2007 .

[28]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information , 2007, Psychological research.

[29]  H. Mittelstaedt A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical , 1983, Naturwissenschaften.

[30]  Ma Gresty,et al.  Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium , 1986 .

[31]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  C. Bard,et al.  Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[33]  N. G. Daunton,et al.  Basic and Applied Aspects of Vestibular Function , 1988 .

[34]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Recovering three-dimensional shape from perspective translations and orthographic rotations. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Myron L. Braunstein,et al.  Recovering three-dimensional shape from perspective translations and orthographic rotations , 1993 .

[36]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.