Creating advocates for mammal conservation through citizen science

Abstract Citizen science initiatives have shown promise to provide informal education about nature and conservation and simultaneously gather scientific data at large scales. eMammal is a platform for citizen science projects that recruits volunteers to place camera traps that collect data in the form of wildlife photographs. Our project offered informal education on wildlife ecology and conservation to volunteers through training materials, feedback during the project, and a natural history blog. We tested whether our education efforts and volunteer activities affected their project specific skills, wildlife knowledge, conservation attitudes, and what kind of information they shared with their social network. Volunteers accurately (> 90%) identified 15 of 20 wildlife species captured in the photos and reduced the rejection rate of camera placements over time. Our surveys showed that volunteer's attitudes toward conservation were high before joining the project and did not change after participating. However, volunteer knowledge of wildlife was higher after working with eMammal. Volunteers also became advocates for mammal conservation by sharing their new knowledge. Roughly half of our volunteers reported actively discussing some type of information related to wildlife both before (50%) and after (54%) the project. However, after volunteering they were 84% more likely to discuss local mammals or local mammal conservation. The likelihood of discussing local mammals was positively influenced by the number of predator photos captured by volunteers, showing that the type of experience can influence how information is spread through a volunteer's social network. Citizen science can connect people to the natural world while simultaneously providing reliable data for conservation.

[1]  Vidal Díaz de Rada,et al.  Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Don A. Dillman, Jolene D. Smyth y Leah Melani Christian. (New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons, 2014) , 2016 .

[2]  R. Jordan,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Volunteers in Mapping Invasive Plants in Public Conservation Lands , 2012, Environmental Management.

[3]  Rebecca Jordan,et al.  Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen‐science learning outcomes , 2012 .

[4]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[5]  Oliver R W Pergams,et al.  Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[7]  Oliver R W Pergams,et al.  Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  P. Kareiva,et al.  The Impact of Nature Experience on Willingness to Support Conservation , 2009, PloS one.

[9]  R. Bonney,et al.  Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project , 2005 .

[10]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs , 2013 .

[11]  Celia A. Evans,et al.  The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant Outcomes of a Citizen‐Science Ecological Research Project , 2005 .

[12]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[13]  D. Decker,et al.  APPLYING WILDLIFE VALUES INFORMATION IN MANAGEMENT: THE WILDLIFE ATTITUDES AND VALUES SCALE , 1989 .

[14]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems , 2007 .

[15]  Rick Bonney,et al.  The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement , 2012 .

[16]  James R. Miller Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Lucy D. Robinson,et al.  Contributions to conservation outcomes by natural history museum-led citizen science: Examining evidence and next steps , 2017 .

[18]  John M. Reveles,et al.  Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning , 2005 .

[19]  Zhihai He,et al.  Volunteer-run cameras as distributed sensors for macrosystem mammal research , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  F. Berkes Community-based conservation in a globalized world , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Kristine F. Stepenuck,et al.  Volunteer Stream Monitoring and Local Participation in Natural Resource Issues , 2004 .

[22]  Richard Louv,et al.  Last child in the woods : saving our children from nature-deficit disorder , 2008 .

[23]  Rebecca Jordan,et al.  What should every citizen know about ecology , 2009 .

[24]  Margret C. Domroese,et al.  Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project , 2017 .

[25]  John M. Dirkx,et al.  Motivations of Adults for Non-Formal Conservation Education and Volunteerism: Implications for Programming , 2009 .

[26]  B. Cohen Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability , 2006 .

[27]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  R. Jordan,et al.  Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen‐Science Programs , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[29]  Todd W. Arnold Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion , 2010 .

[30]  C. Findlay,et al.  The Rauischholzhausen Agenda for Road Ecology , 2007 .

[31]  A Donner,et al.  Application of the McNemar test to non-independent matched pair data. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  D. Wascher,et al.  Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation , 2004 .

[33]  Leska S. Fore,et al.  Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. , 2001 .

[34]  Rebecca Jordan,et al.  The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy , 2013, Public understanding of science.

[35]  L. Dierking,et al.  Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: lessons from research in zoos and aquariums , 2007 .

[36]  H. Ballard,et al.  Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation , 2017 .

[37]  Mark E. Lichtenstein,et al.  Urbanization on the US landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century , 2004 .

[38]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case study , 2011 .

[39]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[40]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem , 1969 .

[41]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[42]  Lynn D. Dierking,et al.  The 95 Percent Solution , 2010 .

[43]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Rick Bonney,et al.  The history of public participation in ecological research , 2012 .