Use of Beef Semen on Dairy Farms: A Cross-Sectional Study on Attitudes of Farmer Toward Breeding Strategies

The use of beef semen on dairy cows has been increasing steadily since 2017. We aimed to describe dairy management practices toward the use of beef semen by surveying farmers in California, the largest US dairy producer. In January 2020, we mailed a printed version of the beef semen use survey to 1,017 dairy producers in California, who also had the option to answer the survey online. The questionnaire consisted of 33 questions that were categorized into three sections: general herd information (n = 10), beef semen management (n = 17), and sexed dairy semen management (n = 6). The response rate was 13.9% (n = 141). Regression models were used to evaluate the associations between the dairy-beef crossbred sale price, use of beef semen, and use of sexed dairy semen vs. herd characteristics. The mean ± SD herd size was 1,693 ± 1,311 milking cows. Most dairies (81%) reported using beef semen on dairy cows. Among respondents, 78% reported extra profit as the main advantage of using beef semen, followed by control of heifer inventory (69%), genetic improvement (37%), and other factors (8%). Most respondents (58%) started using beef semen in the past 3 years and 34% of the respondents were breeding more than 30% of all the eligible cows with beef semen. Angus semen was the most used (reported by 89% of the respondents), followed by Limousin (12%), Wagyu (10%), Charolais (7%), others (5%, Limflex, Stabilizer, and Hereford), and Simmental (4%). Reproductive performance was an important criterion to select cows to receive beef semen and 45% of the respondents reported starting breeding cows with beef semen from the third breeding, 18% on the fourth breeding, and 21% on the fifth or greater breedings. The region of California (a proxy for type of production system) contracts with a calf ranch and the herd breed explained 76.7% of the observed variation in the day-old dairy beef crossbred calf price. Survey results demonstrated the widespread use of beef semen in dairies and the main breeding strategies adopted by dairy farmers.

[1]  D. Berry Invited review: Beef-on-dairy-The generation of crossbred beef × dairy cattle. , 2021, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  D. Berry,et al.  Carcass and efficiency metrics of beef cattle differ by whether the calf was born in a dairy or a beef herd. , 2020, Journal of animal science.

[3]  T. M. McWhorter,et al.  Investigating conception rate for beef service sires bred to dairy cows and heifers. , 2020, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  W. Britz,et al.  Economic opportunities of using crossbreeding and sexing in Holstein dairy herds. , 2020, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  A. De Vries Symposium review: Why revisit dairy cattle productive lifespan? , 2020, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  K. Dhuyvetter,et al.  Symposium review: An abundance of replacement heifers: What is the economic impact of raising more than are needed? , 2020, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  J. Heguy,et al.  Needs assessment for cooperative extension dairy programs in California. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  J. Morrell,et al.  Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen , 2018, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[9]  M. D. Vries,et al.  Effectiveness of climate change mitigation options considering the amount of meat produced in dairy systems , 2018 .

[10]  A. D. Vries,et al.  Economic trade-offs between genetic improvement and longevity in dairy cattle , 2017 .

[11]  A. C. Sørensen,et al.  Economic opportunities for using sexed semen and semen of beef bulls in dairy herds. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  D. Bickhart,et al.  0372 Sexed-semen usage for Holstein AI in the United States. , 2016 .

[13]  Alison L. Van Eenennaam,et al.  Survey of management practices related to bovine respiratory disease in preweaned calves on California dairies. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  J. Pryce,et al.  Genetics and genomics of reproductive performance in dairy and beef cattle. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[15]  P. Gerber,et al.  Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: II. A review of manure management mitigation options. , 2013, Journal of animal science.