Morphological Decomposition and the Reverse Base Frequency Effect

If recognition of a polymorphemic word always takes place via its decomposition into stem and affix, then the higher the frequency of its stem (i.e., base frequency) the easier the lexical decision response should be when frequency of the word itself (i.e., surface frequency) is controlled. Past experiments have demonstrated such a base frequency effect, but not under all circumstances. Thus, a dual pathway notion has become dominant as an account of morphological processing whereby both decomposition and whole–word access is possible. Two experiments are reported here that demonstrate how an obligatory decomposition account can handle the absence of base frequency effects. In particular, it is shown that the later stage of recombining the stem and affix is harder for high base frequency words than for lower base frequency words when matched on surface frequency, and that this can counterbalance the advantage of easier access to the higher frequency stem. When the combination stage is crucial for discriminating the word items from the nonword items, a reverse base frequency effect emerges, revealing the disadvantage at this stage for high base frequency words. Such an effect is hard for the dual–pathway account to explain, but follows naturally from the idea of obligatory decomposition.

[1]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[2]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[3]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[4]  M. Taft Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Morris Halle,et al.  The rules of language , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[6]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Morphological Structure and Lexical Access. , 1984 .

[7]  S. Kinoshita,et al.  Visual and Auditory Recognition of Prefixed Words , 1986 .

[8]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Representation and processing of derived words , 1987 .

[9]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Lexical access and inflectional morphology , 1988, Cognition.

[10]  Mark S. Seidenberg Reading Complex Words , 1989 .

[11]  J. Segui,et al.  On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect , 1989 .

[12]  Alessandro Laudanna,et al.  Chapter 18 Units of Representation for Derived Words in the Lexicon , 1992 .

[13]  Ram Frost,et al.  Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning , 1992 .

[14]  Matti Laine,et al.  Cognitive morphology in finnish: Foundations of a new model , 1994 .

[15]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing , 1994 .

[16]  C. Beauvillain,et al.  The Integration of Morphological and Whole-Word Form Information during Eye Fixations on Prefixed and Suffixed Words ☆ , 1996 .

[17]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  How Complex Simplex Words can be , 1997 .

[18]  R. Baayen,et al.  Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model , 1997 .

[19]  A. Jongman,et al.  Processing of English inflectional morphology , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .

[21]  William Badecker,et al.  Stem Homograph Inhibition and Stem Allomorphy: Representing and Processing Inflected Forms in a Multilevel Lexical System☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[22]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .

[23]  Matti Laine,et al.  The Interplay of Word Formation Type, Affixal Homonymy, and Productivity in Lexical Processing: Evidence from a Morphologically Rich Language , 1999 .

[24]  R. Baayen,et al.  The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: the role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading , 2000 .

[26]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming , 2000 .

[27]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Morphological Representation as a Correlation Between form and Meaning , 2003 .