In Search of Homo economicus

Homo economicus, a model for humans in neoclassical economics, is a rational maximizer of self-interest. However, many social scientists regard such a person as a mere imaginary creature. We found that 31 of 446 residents of relatively wealthy Tokyo suburbs met the behavioral definition of Homo economicus. In several rounds of economic games, participants whose behavior was consistent with this model always apportioned the money endowed by the experimenter to themselves, leaving no share for their partners. These participants had high IQs and a deliberative decision style. An additional 39 participants showed a similar disregard for other people’s welfare, although they were slightly more altruistic than those in the Homo economicus group. The psychological composition of these quasi–Homo economicus participants was distinct from that of participants in the Homo economicus group. Although participants in the latter group behaved selfishly on the basis of rational calculations, those in the former group made selfish choices impulsively. The implications of these findings concerning the two types of extreme noncooperators are discussed.

[1]  David Herlihy,et al.  The Great Transformation ? , 2007 .

[2]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  The Social Exchange Heuristic: Managing Errors in Social Exchange , 2007 .

[3]  D. J. Lee Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[4]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[5]  [The effect of empathy on accuracy of behavior prediction in social exchange situation]. , 2004, Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology.

[6]  Christopher J Patrick,et al.  Factor structure of the psychopathic personality inventory: validity and implications for clinical assessment. , 2003, Psychological assessment.

[7]  R. R. Abidin Psychological Assessment Resources , 1995 .

[8]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[9]  Lynn A. Stout Cultivating Conscience: How Good Laws Make Good People , 2010 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[11]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[12]  Melvin J. Kimmel,et al.  Twenty Years of Experimental Gaming: Critique,Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future , 1977 .

[13]  Mark H. Davis Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[14]  W. J. Jacobs,et al.  Consilience and Life History Theory: From Genes to Brain to Reproductive Strategy. , 2006 .

[15]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  A measure of emotional empathy. , 1972, Journal of personality.

[16]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation , 1988 .

[17]  Jennifer Urner,et al.  Studies In Machiavellianism , 2016 .

[18]  A. Buss,et al.  The aggression questionnaire. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  M. Sahlins Stone Age Economics , 2020 .

[20]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  K A Kiehl,et al.  Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan , 1994 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Ashley L. Watts,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Fearless Dominance and the U.S. Presidency: Implications of Psychopathic Personality Traits for Successful and Unsuccessful Political Leadership , 2012 .

[26]  A. Sen,et al.  Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory , 1977 .

[27]  R. Oda,et al.  Development and Validation of a Japanese Version of the Machiavellianism Scale , 2012 .