Lessons learned from participating in D3R 2016 Grand Challenge 2: compounds targeting the farnesoid X receptor

D3R 2016 Grand Challenge 2 focused on predictions of binding modes and affinities for 102 compounds against the farnesoid X receptor (FXR). In this challenge, two distinct methods, a docking-based method and a template-based method, were employed by our team for the binding mode prediction. For the new template-based method, 3D ligand similarities were calculated for each query compound against the ligands in the co-crystal structures of FXR available in Protein Data Bank. The binding mode was predicted based on the co-crystal protein structure containing the ligand with the best ligand similarity score against the query compound. For the FXR dataset, the template-based method achieved a better performance than the docking-based method on the binding mode prediction. For the binding affinity prediction, an in-house knowledge-based scoring function ITScore2 and MM/PBSA approach were employed. Good performance was achieved for MM/PBSA, whereas the performance of ITScore2 was sensitive to ligand composition, e.g. the percentage of carbon atoms in the compounds. The sensitivity to ligand composition could be a clue for the further improvement of our knowledge-based scoring function.

[1]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[3]  P. Kollman,et al.  Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices , 1998 .

[4]  Shuai Liu,et al.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein–ligand pose and affinity predictions , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[5]  Folkert Kuipers,et al.  The Farnesoid X Receptor Modulates Adiposity and Peripheral Insulin Sensitivity in Mice* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  B. Brooks,et al.  An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms , 1988 .

[7]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function to predict protein–ligand interactions: II. Validation of the scoring function , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  SHENG-YOU HUANG,et al.  An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function to predict protein–ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[10]  Benjamin A. Ellingson,et al.  Conformer Generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and Validation Using High Quality Structures from the Protein Databank and Cambridge Structural Database , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[12]  Grace Guo,et al.  The Farnesoid X-receptor Is an Essential Regulator of Cholesterol Homeostasis* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  Hualiang Jiang,et al.  SHAFTS: a hybrid approach for 3D molecular similarity calculation. 2. Prospective case study in the discovery of diverse p90 ribosomal S6 protein kinase 2 inhibitors to suppress cell migration. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Ke Ma,et al.  Farnesoid X receptor is essential for normal glucose homeostasis. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[15]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  K. Sharp,et al.  Accurate Calculation of Hydration Free Energies Using Macroscopic Solvent Models , 1994 .

[17]  Xiaofeng Liu,et al.  SHAFTS: A Hybrid Approach for 3D Molecular Similarity Calculation. 1. Method and Assessment of Virtual Screening , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  Eamonn F. Healy,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF QUANTUM MECHANICAL MOLECULAR MODELS. 76. AM1: A NEW GENERAL PURPOSE QUANTUM MECHANICAL MOLECULAR MODEL , 1985 .

[19]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[20]  Chengfei Yan,et al.  Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions Derived from Rigid and Flexible Decoy Structures: Evaluation with the 2013 and 2014 CSAR Benchmarks , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  David A. Case,et al.  On finding stationary states on large-molecule potential energy surfaces , 1985 .

[22]  Eamonn F. Healy,et al.  Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model , 1985 .

[23]  Jasmine Chen,et al.  Identification of a nuclear receptor that is activated by farnesol metabolites , 1995, Cell.

[24]  Anthony Nicholls,et al.  Conformer Generation with OMEGA: Learning from the Data Set and the Analysis of Failures , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[25]  Yanqiao Zhang,et al.  Loss of FXR protects against diet-induced obesity and accelerates liver carcinogenesis in ob/ob mice. , 2012, Molecular endocrinology.

[26]  Masahiro Tohkin,et al.  Targeted Disruption of the Nuclear Receptor FXR/BAR Impairs Bile Acid and Lipid Homeostasis , 2000, Cell.

[27]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[28]  Zhihai Liu,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[29]  Ray Luo,et al.  Accelerated Poisson–Boltzmann calculations for static and dynamic systems , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[31]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear receptor. , 1999, Science.

[33]  Chengfei Yan,et al.  Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015 , 2017, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[34]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[35]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.