Information structure as parallel tree building

Information Structure (IS) can be seen as a separate component of grammar (see Vallduvi 1990, Vallduvi and Engdahl 1996, Eilam 2011, and others), which determines how information is assimilated into a hearer’s knowledge store, and which mediates syntax and phonology. Such accounts take the focus-ground distinction to be the most basic distinction made by IS. In contrast, analyses such as that of Rooth (1992) treat focus as a syntactic feature that is interpreted by the semantic component of grammar, and which may have phonological consequences. Accounts like Rooth’s give focus a privileged status, capturing the intuition that focused material uniquely serves to answer the question under discussion. In this paper we propose an account that, like Vallduvi and others, takes focus and ground to be primitive elements of an informational component, but which gives focus the unique property of receiving a pragmatically determined interpretation.

[1]  Ivona Kučerová,et al.  The syntax of givenness , 2007 .

[2]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  On the Syntactic Marking of Presupposed Open Propositions , 1986 .

[3]  Michael Wagner Contrasts and Positions in Information Structure: Focus and givenness: a unified approach , 2012 .

[4]  Werner Frey,et al.  Pragmatic Properties of Certain German and English Left Peripheral Constructions , 2005 .

[5]  Prashant Parikh The use of language , 2001 .

[6]  Anthony S. Kroch,et al.  The Linguistic Relevance of Tree Adjoining Grammar , 1985 .

[7]  Katalin É. Kiss,et al.  Topic and focus: Two structural positions associated with logical functions in the left periphery of the Hungarian sentence , 2008 .

[8]  Roger Schwarzschild,et al.  GIVENNESS, AVOIDF AND OTHER CONSTRAINTS ON THE PLACEMENT OF ACCENT* , 1999 .

[9]  Robert Frank,et al.  Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies , 2002, Computational Linguistics.

[10]  Daniel Büring,et al.  What’s New (and What’s Given) in the Theory of Focus? , 2008 .

[11]  Mats Rooth A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[12]  David F. Sally `What an Ugly Baby!' , 2002 .

[13]  Aviad Eilam Explorations in the Informational Component , 2011 .

[14]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[15]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[16]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  CONTRASTIVE FOCUS, GIVENNESS AND THE UNMARKED STATUS OF "DISCOURSE-NEW"* , 2008 .

[17]  Prashant Parikh,et al.  Language and Equilibrium , 2010 .

[18]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[19]  Daniel Büring,et al.  Semantics, Intonation and Information Structure , 2007 .

[20]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Synchronous Tree-Adjoining Grammars , 1990, COLING.

[21]  Susan F. Schmerling,et al.  A Re-Examination of 'Normal Stress' , 1974 .

[22]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[23]  Satoshi Tomioka,et al.  Contrastive topics operate on speech acts , 2009 .

[24]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics , 2012 .

[25]  Michael Wagner,et al.  Givenness and Locality , 2006 .

[26]  E. Engdahl,et al.  The linguistic realization of information packaging , 2013 .