A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Neural Dissociations between Brand and Person Judgments

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to investigate whether semantic judgments about products and persons are processed similarly. Our results suggest they are not: comparisons of neural correlates of product versus human descriptor judgments indicated greater activation in the medial prefrontal cortex regions for persons; for products, activation was greater in the left inferior prefrontal cortex, an area known to be involved in object processing. These findings serve to challenge the view that processing of products and brands is akin to that of humans and set a precedent for the use of fMRI techniques in consumer neuroscience studies.

[1]  G. Hartman.  The biological basis. , 1922 .

[2]  Stephen G. Gilligan,et al.  Remembering information related to one's self ☆ , 1979 .

[3]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[4]  S. Klein,et al.  The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. , 1988 .

[5]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion , 1995 .

[6]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Moderators of the Impact of Self-Reference on Persuasion , 1996 .

[7]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  S. Fournier,et al.  Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research , 1998 .

[11]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[12]  G. Winocur,et al.  In Search of the Self: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1999 .

[13]  Joseph T. Plummer.  How Personality Makes a Difference , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[14]  R. Buxton,et al.  Detection Power, Estimation Efficiency, and Predictability in Event-Related fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[16]  Claudio Barbaranelli,et al.  Brand personality: How to make the metaphor fit? , 2001 .

[17]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separating Processes within a Trial in Event-Related Functional MRI II. Analysis , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  R. Adolphs.  The neurobiology of social cognition , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separating Processes within a Trial in Event-Related Functional MRI I. The Method , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  G. Shulman,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Uta Frith,et al.  The Biological Basis of Social Interaction , 2001 .

[23]  C. N. Macrae,et al.  Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Gary H Glover,et al.  Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: Statistical power analyses , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Distinct neural systems subserve person and object knowledge , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Smidts.  Kijken in het brein: Over de mogelijkheden van neuromarketing , 2002 .

[27]  S. Rossitti.  Introduction to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Principles and Techniques , 2002 .

[28]  Jennifer Edson Escalas,et al.  You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands , 2003 .

[29]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm , 2003, NeuroImage.

[30]  J. Kapferer,et al.  Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? , 2003 .

[31]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics , 2005 .

[32]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  P. Aggarwal.  The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior , 2004 .

[34]  Mahzarin R. Banaji,et al.  Encoding-Specific Effects of Social Cognition on the Neural Correlates of Subsequent Memory , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  An empirical investigation into the number of subjects required for an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[36]  You are what they eat. , 2005, Consumer reports.

[37]  Yul-Wan Sung,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Scholarpedia.