A systematic review of socio-economic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of fruit and vegetables

Objective: To evaluate the differences in the consumption of fruit and vegetables between groups with different socio-economic status (SES) in the adult population of European countries.Design: A systematic review of published and unpublished surveys of food habits conducted between 1985 and 1999 in 15 European countries. Educational level and occupational status were used as indicators of SES. A pooled estimate of the mean difference between the highest and the lowest level of education and occupation was calculated separately for men and women, using DerSimonian and Laird's random effects model.Setting: The inclusion criteria of studies were: use of a validated method for assessing intake at the individual level; selection of a nationwide sample or a representative sample of a region; and providing the mean and standard deviation of overall fruit and vegetable consumption for each level of education or occupation, and separately for men and women.Subjects: Participants in the individual surveys had to be adults (18–85 y).Results: Eleven studies from seven countries met the criteria for being included in the meta-analysis. A higher SES was associated with a greater consumption of both fruit and vegetables. The pooled estimate of the difference in the intake of fruit was 24.3 g/person/day (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.0–34.7) between men in the highest level of education and those in the lowest level of education. Similarly, this difference was 33.6 g/person/day for women (95% CI 22.5–44.8). The differences regarding vegetables were 17.0 g/person/day (95% CI 8.6–25.5) for men and 13.4 g/person/day (95% CI 7.1–19.7) for women. The results were in the same direction when occupation instead of education was used as an indicator of SES.Conclusions: Although we cannot exclude over-reporting of intake by those with highest SES, it is unlikely that this potential bias could fully explain the differences we have found. Our results suggest that an unhealthier nutrition pattern may exist among adults belonging to lower socio-economic levels in Europe.Sponsorship: The present study was supported by the European Union's FAIR programme (FAIR-97-3096).European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2000) 54, 706–714

[1]  M. Nelson,et al.  Socioeconomic determinants of health: The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health , 1997 .

[2]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[3]  J. Berlin,et al.  Invited commentary: benefits of heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  Gower Street,et al.  Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study , 1991, The Lancet.

[5]  B. Popkin,et al.  Health lifestyle patterns of U.S. adults. , 1994, Preventive medicine.

[6]  K. Ankeny,et al.  Factors associated with adoption of dietary behavior to reduce heart disease risk among males , 1991 .

[7]  G A Colditz,et al.  Heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies: a commentary. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  M. Blaxter.  Health and lifestyles , 1990 .

[9]  Relative validity and reproducibility of a diet history questionnaire in Spain. I. Foods. EPIC Group of Spain. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  J. Mackenbach,et al.  Socio-economic Differences in Risk Factors for Morbidity and Mortality in the European Community , 1997, Journal of health psychology.

[11]  J. Blundell,et al.  Assessing dietary intake: Who, what and why of under-reporting , 1998, Nutrition Research Reviews.

[12]  E. Lund,et al.  Relationship between dietary habits, age, lifestyle, and socio-economic status among adult Norwegian women. The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study , 1998, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[13]  A. M. Smith,et al.  Public health implications of dietary differences between social status and occupational category groups. , 1992, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[14]  C. A. Holcomb.  Positive influence of age and education on food consumption and nutrient intakes of older women living alone. , 1995, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[15]  L. Hedges.  Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. , 1982 .

[16]  G. Pera,et al.  Dietary intake of vegetables and fruits among adults in five regions of Spain , 1999, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[17]  R. Prättälä,et al.  Consistency and variation in unhealthy behaviour among Finnish men, 1982-1990. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[18]  M. Rogers,et al.  Indicators of poor dietary habits in a high risk population. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Nutrition.

[19]  Walter C. Willett,et al.  24-Hour Dietary Recall and Food Record Methods , 1998 .

[20]  R. Knibbe,et al.  Social Class Differences in Women's Fat and Fibre Consumption: A Cross-National Study , 1997, Appetite.

[21]  E. Brunner,et al.  Socio-economic differentials in health: The role of nutrition , 1997, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[22]  P. Pietinen,et al.  Modern and healthy?: socioeconomic differences in the quality of diet. , 1996, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[23]  P. Puska,et al.  Diminishing or increasing contrasts? Social class variation in Finnish food consumption patterns, 1979-1990. , 1992, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[24]  J. Martínez,et al.  Definition of healthy eating in the Spanish adult population: a national sample in a pan-European survey. , 1998, Public health.

[25]  Walter C. Willett,et al.  Food-Frequency Methods , 1998 .