Frequency Characteristics of Visually Induced Motion Sickness

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the frequency response of visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) for oscillating linear motion in the fore-and-aft axis. Background: Simulators, virtual environments, and commercially available video games that create an illusion of self-motion are often reported to induce the symptoms seen in response to true motion. Often this human response can be the limiting factor in the acceptability and usability of such systems. Whereas motion sickness in physically moving environments is known to peak at an oscillation frequency around 0.2 Hz, it has recently been suggested that VIMS peaks at around 0.06 Hz following the proposal that the summed response of the visual and vestibular self-motion systems is maximized at this frequency. Methods: We exposed 24 participants to random dot optical flow patterns simulating oscillating fore-and-aft motion within the frequency range of 0.025 to 1.6 Hz. Before and after each 20-min exposure, VIMS was assessed with the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire. Also, a standard motion sickness scale was used to rate symptoms at 1-min intervals during each trial. Results: VIMS peaked between 0.2 and 0.4 Hz with a reducing effect at lower and higher frequencies. Conclusion: The numerical prediction of the “crossover frequency” hypothesis, and the design guidance curve previously proposed, cannot be accepted when the symptoms are purely visually induced. Application: In conditions in which stationary observers are exposed to optical flow that simulates oscillating fore-and-aft motion, frequencies around 0.2 to 0.4 Hz should be avoided.

[1]  J. O'hanlon,et al.  Motion sickness incidence as a function of the frequency and acceleration of vertical sinusoidal motion. , 1973, Aerospace medicine.

[2]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Handbook of Virtual Environments - Design, Implementation, and Applications, Second Edition , 2014, Handbook of Virtual Environments, 2nd ed..

[3]  J. Golding,et al.  Effect of frequency of horizontal linear oscillation on motion sickness and somatogravic illusion. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  M J Griffin,et al.  Motion sickness and motion characteristics of vessels at sea. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[5]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  An ecological Theory of Motion Sickness and Postural Instability , 1991 .

[6]  Jelte E. Bos Visual image safety , 2011, Displays.

[7]  W. Bles,et al.  Motion sickness: only one provocative conflict? , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[8]  H. E. Vongierke,et al.  Differences in otolith and abdominal viscera graviceptor dynamics: implications for motion sickness and perceived body position. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[9]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  “Conflicting” Motion Cues to the Visual and Vestibular Self- Motion Systems Around 0.06 Hz Evoke Simulator Sickness , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[11]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Induced self-motion in central vision. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  J F Golding,et al.  A motion sickness maximum around the 0.2 Hz frequency range of horizontal translational oscillation. , 2001, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  C. Oman Sensory conflict in motion sickness: an Observer Theory approach , 1991 .

[14]  Michael J Griffin,et al.  Motion sickness: effect of the frequency of lateral oscillation. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  Marc M. Sebrechts,et al.  HANDBOOK OF VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS , 2014 .

[16]  Margaret D. Nolan,et al.  Vection and simulator sickness. , 1990, Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[17]  J F Golding,et al.  Frequency effect of 0.35-1.0 Hz horizontal translational oscillation on motion sickness and the somatogravic illusion. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .

[19]  W. Bles,et al.  Motion sickness. , 2000, Current opinion in neurology.

[20]  Behrang Keshavarz,et al.  Illusory Self-Motion in Virtual Environments , 2014, Handbook of Virtual Environments, 2nd ed..

[21]  Frederick Bonato,et al.  Optokinetic drum tilt hastens the onset of vection-induced motion sickness. , 2003, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[22]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Postural instability precedes motion sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[23]  Jelte E. Bos,et al.  Nuancing the relationship between motion sickness and postural stability , 2011, Displays.

[24]  Ernst Mach,et al.  Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungsempfindungen , 1967 .

[25]  T. Ledin,et al.  Influence of different conditions for tilt compensation on symptoms of motion sickness in tilting trains , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[26]  J. Golding Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[27]  J F Golding,et al.  Motion sickness and tilts of the inertial force environment: active suspension systems vs. active passengers. , 2003, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[28]  J. Golding,et al.  Off-vertical axis rotation of the visual field and nauseogenicity. , 2009, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[29]  Jelte E. Bos,et al.  A theory on visually induced motion sickness , 2008, Displays.

[30]  P. Howarth,et al.  Habituation to the Side Effects of Immersion in a Virtual Environment , 2000 .

[31]  Peter A. Howarth The adverse health and safety effects of viewing visual images , 2008, Displays.

[32]  S Hu,et al.  Optokinetic nystagmus correlates with severity of vection-induced motion sickness and gastric tachyarrhythmia. , 1998, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[33]  G. H. Crampton,et al.  Motion and Space Sickness , 1990 .

[34]  J. Crowley Simulator sickness: a problem for Army aviation. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[35]  James J. W. User Lin Effects of Simulated Motion Frequency in Virtual Environments , 2005 .

[36]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Developing Automated Methods to Quantify the Visual Stimulus for Cybersickness , 1996 .

[37]  Andy T. K. Ho,et al.  A Metric to Quantify Virtual Scene Movement for the Study of Cybersickness: Definition, Implementation, and Verification , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[38]  W. Bles,et al.  Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[39]  Golding Jf,et al.  Effect of frequency of horizontal linear oscillation on motion sickness and somatogravic illusion. , 1996 .

[40]  J. Stott,et al.  Mechanisms and Treatment of Motion Illness , 1986 .

[41]  Crowley Js Simulator Sickness: A Problem for Army Aviation , 1987 .

[42]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Effects of participating in virtual environmentsa review of current knowledge , 1996 .

[43]  M. Bagshaw,et al.  The desensitisation of chronically motion sick aircrew in the Royal Air Force. , 1985, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.