Clinical Evaluation of a Newly Developed Guidewire for Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy

Background: The guidewire (GW) plays an important role in pancreatobiliary endoscopy. GW quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of pancreatobiliary endoscopy. In this study, we evaluate a new 0.025 inch multipurpose endoscopic GW: the M-Through. Methods: Our study was a multicenter retrospective analysis. We enrolled patients who underwent endoscopic procedures using the M-Through between May 2018 and April 2020. Patients receiving the following endoscopic treatments were enrolled: common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction, endoscopic drainage for distal and hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), and endoscopic drainage for acute cholecystitis. For each procedure, we examined the rate of success without GW exchange. Results: A total of 170 patients (80 with CBD stones, 60 with MBO, and 30 with cholecystitis) were enrolled. The rate of completion without GW exchange was 100% for CBD stone extraction, 83.3% for endoscopic drainage for MBO, and 43.3% for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. In unsuccessful cholecystitis cases with the original GW manipulator, 1 of 8 cases succeeded in the manipulator exchange. Including 6 cases who changed GW after the manipulator exchange, 11 of 16 cases succeeded in changing GW. There was significant difference in the success rate between the manipulator exchange and GW exchange (p = 0.03). The insertion of devices and stent placement after biliary cannulation (regardless of type) were almost completed with M-through. We observed no intraoperative GW-related adverse events such as perforation and bleeding due to manipulation. Conclusion: The 0.025 inch M-Through can be used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures efficiently and safely. Our study found high rates of success without GW exchange in all procedures except for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. This GW is considered (1) excellent for supportability of device insertion to remove CBD stones; (2) good for seeking the biliary malignant stricture but sometimes need the help of a hydrophilic GW; (3) suboptimal for gallbladder drainage that require a high level of seeking ability.

[1]  Z. Sobani,et al.  Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis , 2020, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[2]  M. Shimizu,et al.  Factors affecting technical success of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis , 2020, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[3]  R. Rerknimitr,et al.  Practical Approaches for High-Risk Surgical Patients with Acute Cholecystitis: The Percutaneous Approach versus Endoscopic Alternatives , 2020, Clinical endoscopy.

[4]  C. Kwon,et al.  Technical Reports of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Guidewires on the Basis of Physical Properties , 2019, Clinical Endoscopy.

[5]  G. Asano,et al.  Successful endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting using a new easily maneuverable guidewire: a report of two cases , 2019, Endoscopy.

[6]  Don Haeng Lee,et al.  Effectiveness of a novel highly flexible‐tip guidewire on selective biliary cannulation compared to conventional guidewire: Randomized controlled study , 2018, Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

[7]  O. Yokosuka,et al.  Clinical utility of 0.025-inch guidewire VisiGlide2TM in the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures , 2017, World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[8]  Masatsugu Nagahama,et al.  Perforation of the Papilla of Vater in Wire-Guided Cannulation , 2016, Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[9]  Hitoshi Yoshida,et al.  0.025-inch vs 0.035-inch guide wires for wire-guided cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized study. , 2015, World journal of gastroenterology.

[10]  N. Fujita,et al.  Clinical usefulness of double‐guidewire technique for difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography , 2014, Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

[11]  A. Irisawa,et al.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized study of selective bile duct cannulation performed by multiple endoscopists: the BIDMEN study. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  N. Stern,et al.  Portal vein cannulation: an uncommon complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. , 2011, World journal of gastroenterology.

[13]  M. Neurath,et al.  Refinement of ERCP by using the Olympus V-scope system with a 0.025 in. compatible and complete fixable Visiglide(®) guidewire. , 2011, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[14]  M. Asaka,et al.  Portobiliary fistula: unusual complication of wire-guided cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. , 2011, Endoscopy.

[15]  T. Baron,et al.  Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis. , 2010, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  J. Sung,et al.  Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  N. Hirata,et al.  A rare complication during ERCP and sphincterotomy: placement of an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube in the portal vein. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.