Keratoprostheses in clinical practice – a review

The search for a substitute for the natural cornea dates back more than 200 years. Although several devices have been developed and trialled, very few have had successful long‐term results and continue in regular clinical use. Keratoprosthesis (KPro) surgery is complex and should be performed in centres with an experienced multidisciplinary team. Currently available KPro devices range from the totally synthetic, such as the Boston KPro, to the totally biological tissue‐engineered artificial cornea. The osteo‐odonto keratoprothesis combines a synthetic optic with a biological haptic. All keratoprostheses have significant limitations, although visual improvement is possible with each of the devices in clinical use today. This review discusses these devices with emphasis on their indications, surgical techniques and results, before briefly exploring emerging devices and innovative approaches for the future.

[1]  F. Yu,et al.  The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[2]  R. Tandon,et al.  Visual rehabilitation in end-stage inflammatory ocular surface disease with the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis: results from the UK , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[3]  S. Dravida,et al.  Tissue-engineered recombinant human collagen-based corneal substitutes for implantation: performance of type I versus type III collagen. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  J. Forrester,et al.  Regeneration of Corneal Cells and Nerves in an Implanted Collagen Corneal Substitute , 2008, Cornea.

[5]  S. Sel,et al.  Towards an Artificial Cornea: Evaluation of a New Designed Hydrophobic One-Material Implant With Modified Surfaces in vitro and in vivo , 2008 .

[6]  Ling-Ling Chan,et al.  Keratoprosthesis surgery for end-stage corneal blindness in asian eyes. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[7]  D. Tan,et al.  Keratoprosthesis surgery. , 2008, Developments in ophthalmology.

[8]  James V Aquavella,et al.  Pediatric keratoprosthesis. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[9]  Celia R Hicks,et al.  AlphaCor: Clinical Outcomes , 2006, Cornea.

[10]  M. Belin,et al.  Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[11]  P. Luthert,et al.  Legeais BioKpro III keratoprosthesis implantation: long term results in seven patients , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[12]  J. Noolandi,et al.  Biocompatibility of a Hydrogel Corneal Inlay in vivo , 2006 .

[13]  Rejean Munger,et al.  A simple, cross-linked collagen tissue substitute for corneal implantation. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Q. Maskati,et al.  Asian experience with the Pintucci keratoprosthesis. , 2006, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Gregory J. McCormick,et al.  Keratoprosthesis: the Dohlman-Doane device. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  G. Grabner,et al.  Standards for Modified Osteoodontokeratoprosthesis (OOKP) Surgery According to Strampelli and Falcinelli: The Rome-Vienna Protocol , 2005, Cornea.

[17]  Benedetto Falsini,et al.  Modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis for treatment of corneal blindness: long-term anatomical and functional outcomes in 181 cases. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  Sander R. Dubovy,et al.  Biocompatibility of a Nonpenetrating Synthetic Cornea in Vascularized Rabbit Corneas , 2005, Cornea.

[19]  Valerie Franklin,et al.  The Osteo-Odonto-Keratoprosthesis (OOKP) , 2005, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[20]  D. Azar,et al.  Smolin and Thoft's the cornea : scientific foundations and clinical practice , 2005 .

[21]  Sander R. Dubovy,et al.  Biological response to a supraDescemetic synthetic cornea in rabbits. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  I J Constable,et al.  Corneal replacement using a synthetic hydrogel cornea, AlphaCor™: device, preliminary outcomes and complications , 2003, Eye.

[23]  I. Constable,et al.  The Chirila Keratoprosthesis: phase I human clinical trial. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[24]  T V Chirila,et al.  An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[25]  M. Doane,et al.  Keratoprosthesis: Preoperative Prognostic Categories , 2001, Cornea.

[26]  James Herold,et al.  Optical cylinder designs to increase the field of vision in the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis , 2000, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[27]  I J Constable,et al.  Keratoprostheses: advancing toward a true artificial cornea. , 1997, Survey of ophthalmology.

[28]  M. Doane,et al.  Fabrication of a Keratoprosthesis , 1996, Cornea.

[29]  S Pintucci,et al.  New Dacron tissue colonisable keratoprosthesis: clinical experience. , 1995, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  A. Devoe.  A current evaluation of corneal prosthetic devices. , 1967, Archives of ophthalmology.

[31]  M. Refojo,et al.  Synthetic polymers in corneal surgery. I. Glyceryl methacrylate. , 1967, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  G. Morris,et al.  Patch graft angioplasty in vascular surgery. , 1962, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[33]  W. Knowles.  Effect of intralamellar plastic membranes on corneal physiology. , 1961, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  A. E. Maumenee,et al.  Corneal fluid metabolism; experiments and observations. , 1953, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[35]  W STONE,et al.  Experimental study of plastic material as replacement for the cornea; a preliminary report. , 1953, American journal of ophthalmology.

[36]  O. Anderson.  Theoretical Considerations for an Artificial Corneal Implant * , 1951, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[37]  Andrew E. Forster.  A Review of Keratoplastic Surgery and Some Experiments in Keratoplasty , 1923 .

[38]  R. Elliot.  The mists and halos of glaucoma , 1923 .