The Influence of Guided Inquiry and Explicit Instruction on K–6 Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science

This study assessed the influence of guided inquiry and explicit reflective instruction on K-6 teachers’ views of nature of science (NOS). Using the Views of Nature of Science Elementary School Version 2 (VNOS-D2), and associated interviews we tracked the changes in NOS views of teacher participants prior to and following a summer professional development program. The teachers participated in guided inquiry to improve physics knowledge, and explicit-reflective NOS activities to improve their views of NOS. Videotaped records of the workshop ensured that explicit reflective NOS instruction took place in conjunction with physics inquiry instruction. Analysis indicated that teachers improved their NOS views by the conclusion of the institute Implications for providing professional development combining inquiry and NOS instruction are made.

[1]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[2]  R. Bogdan.  Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[3]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[4]  William F. McComas,et al.  The nature of science in science education : rationales and strategies , 1998 .

[5]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .

[6]  Misconceptions of Physical Science Concepts Among Elementary School Teachers. , 1986 .

[7]  Deborah C. Smith,et al.  The Construction of Subject Matter Knowledge in Primary Science Teaching. , 1989 .

[8]  D. Caulley.  Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods , 2007 .

[9]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[10]  George E. DeBoer,et al.  A history of ideas in science education : implications for practice , 1992 .

[11]  Mike Summers,et al.  Surveys of english primary teachers' conceptions of force, energy, and materials , 1992 .

[12]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[13]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2004 .

[14]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations , 1981 .

[15]  J. Gallagher,et al.  Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science , 1991 .

[16]  M. B. Ogunniyi.  An analysis of prospective science teachers' understanding of the nature of science , 1982 .

[17]  Bruce B. King.  Beginning teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward history and philosophy of science , 1991 .

[18]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al.  Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth‐grade teacher , 2003 .

[19]  Peter Kloosterman,et al.  Science Problem Solving Approaches in Elementary School Classrooms , 1991 .

[20]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[21]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[22]  E. Young.  Seven Blind Mice , 1992 .

[23]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science , 2000 .

[24]  Amy Roth McDuffie,et al.  One course is not enough : Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science , 2006 .

[25]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Tentativeness in Science: Development, Use, and Sources of Change. , 1990 .

[26]  Rutherford's enlarged: a content-embedded activity to teach about nature of science , 2002 .

[27]  Rola Khishfe,et al.  Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders' Views of Nature of Science. , 2002 .

[28]  William F. McComas,et al.  Ten Myths of Science: Reexamining What We Think We Know About the Nature of Science , 1996 .

[29]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers , 1990 .

[30]  Earl R. Glenn,et al.  National association for research in science teaching: National association for research in science teaching , 1929 .

[31]  S. Musante.  Learning the Nature of Science , 2005 .

[32]  Deborah L. Hanuscin,et al.  TEACHING THE NATURE OF SCIENCE THROUGH INQUIRY: THE RESULTS OF A THREE-YEAR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM , 2010 .

[33]  渋江 靖弘,et al.  Science for All Americans , 1990 .

[34]  Mike Summers,et al.  An Investigation of Some Primary Teachers' Understanding of Changes in Materials. , 1989 .

[35]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  TEACHING PHYSICS: Preparing teachers to teach physics and physical science by inquiry , 2000 .

[36]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Avoiding De-Natured Science: Activities that Promote Understandings of the Nature of Science , 1998 .

[37]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al.  Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science , 2004 .