Ultimate strength performance of tankers associated with industry corrosion addition practices

Abstract In the ship and offshore structure design, age-related problems such as corrosion damage, local denting, and fatigue damage are important factors to be considered in building a reliable structure as they have a significant influence on the residual structural capacity. In shipping, corrosion addition methods are widely adopted in structural design to prevent structural capacity degradation. The present study focuses on the historical trend of corrosion addition rules for ship structural design and investigates their effects on the ultimate strength performance such as hull girder and stiffened panel of double hull oil tankers. Three types of rules based on corrosion addition models, namely historic corrosion rules (pre-CSR), Common Structural Rules (CSR), and harmonised Common Structural Rules (CSRH) are considered and compared with two other corrosion models namely UGS model, suggested by the Union of Greek Shipowners (UGS), and Time-Dependent Corrosion Wastage Model (TDCWM). To identify the general trend in the effects of corrosion damage on the ultimate longitudinal strength performance, the corrosion addition rules are applied to four representative sizes of double hull oil tankers namely Panamax, Aframax, Suezmax, and VLCC. The results are helpful in understanding the trend of corrosion additions for tanker structures

[1]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  Effect of corrosion on the ultimate strength of double hulloil tankers – Part I: stiffened panels , 2012 .

[2]  C. Soares,et al.  Corrosion wastage model for ship crude oil tanks , 2008 .

[3]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  Condition assessment of aged structures , 2008 .

[4]  Do Kyun Kim,et al.  Effect of corrosion on the ultimate strength of double hull oil tankers - Part II: hull girders , 2012 .

[5]  Vedran Žanić,et al.  Structural Analysis of TANKER FOR OIL AND CHEMICALS 49000/51800 TDW(3.MAJ: Yard no.712, 713) According to IACS Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers , 2011 .

[6]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Life-cycle co2 emissions of bulk carriers: A comparative study , 2010 .

[7]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  A time-variant corrosion wastage model for subsea gas pipelines , 2014 .

[8]  J K Paik,et al.  A Time-Dependent Corrosion Wastage Model For Bulk , 2003 .

[9]  Chang-Ho Lee,et al.  A study of the kinematic characteristic of a coupling device between the buffer system and the flexible pipe of a deep-seabed mining system , 2014 .

[10]  J. Paik,et al.  Ultimate strength performance of bulk carriers with various corrosion additions , 2015 .

[11]  Do Kyun Kim,et al.  Advanced method for the development of an empirical model to predict time-dependent corrosion wastage , 2012 .

[12]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  Modified Paik–Mansour formula for ultimate strength calculations of ship hulls , 2013 .

[13]  J K Paik,et al.  Ultimate strength performance of Suezmax tanker structures: Pre-CSR versus CSR designs , 2009 .

[14]  Jae-Myung Lee,et al.  A Time-Dependent Corrosion Wastage Model for the Structures of Single-and Double-Hull Tankers and FSOs and FPSOs , 2003 .

[15]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  Ship Structural Analysis and Design , 2010 .

[16]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for seawater ballast tank structures of ships , 2004 .

[17]  김창욱,et al.  Harmonised Common Structural Rules(CSR-H) 개발현황 , 2012 .

[18]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  Time-dependent residual ultimate longitudinal strength - grounding damage index (R-D) diagram , 2014 .

[19]  Vedran Žanić,et al.  STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF SERIES OF BULK CARRIERS (Yard no.724-727) 39 200 DWT ICE 1A ACCORDING TO IACS COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES FOR BULK CARRIERS , 2016 .

[20]  M. H. Mohd,et al.  Investigation of the corrosion progress characteristics of offshore subsea oil well tubes , 2013 .