Children's Interactions with Inspectable and Negotiated Learner Models

The Learner Model of an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) may be made visible (opened) to its users. An Open Learner Model (OLM) may also become a learning resource in its own right, independently of an ITS. OLMs offer potential for learner reflection and support to metacognitive skills such as self-assessment, in addition to improving learner model accuracy. This paper describes an evaluation of an inspectable and a negotiated OLM (one that can be jointly maintained through student-system discussion) in terms of facilitating self-assessment accuracy and modification of model contents. Both inspectable and negotiated models offered significant support to users in increasing the accuracy of self-assessments, and reducing the number and magnitude of discrepancies between system and user beliefs about the user's knowledge. Negotiation of the model demonstrated further significant improvements.

[1]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[2]  Judy Kay,et al.  Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to Give Learner Control and Responsibility , 1997 .

[3]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[4]  Rafael Morales Gamboa,et al.  Exploring Participative Learner Modelling and Its Effects on Learner Behaviour , 2000 .

[5]  H. Pain,et al.  ' Did I say what I think I said , and do you agree with me ? ' : Inspecting and Questioning the Student Model , 1995 .

[6]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[7]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Open Student Models on Self-Assessment , 2007, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[8]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[9]  A. Schoenfeld Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education , 1987 .

[10]  Susan Bull,et al.  CALMsystem: A Conversational Agent for Learner Modelling , 2007, Knowl. Based Syst..

[11]  Vania Dimitrova,et al.  STyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[12]  J. Dewey How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[13]  Patricia Charlton,et al.  Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education , 2009 .

[14]  Jim E. Greer,et al.  Externalising Learner Modelling Representations , 2001 .

[15]  D. Kolb,et al.  The Process of Experiential Learning , 2000 .

[16]  S. Stein What's All the Fuss About? , 1996 .

[17]  Susan Bull,et al.  Bringing chatbots into education: Towards natural language negotiation of open learner models , 2006, Knowl. Based Syst..

[18]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[19]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[20]  Susan Bull,et al.  Supporting Interaction Preferences and Recognition of Misconceptions with Independent Open Learner Models , 2008, AH.

[21]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Limitations of Student Control: Do Students Know When They Need Help? , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.