Towards the Quantification of Peggy Babcock: Speech Errors and Their Position within the Word

Sequences of similar (i.e., partially identical) words can be hard to say, as indicated by error frequencies, longer reaction and execution times. This study investigates the role of the location of this partial identity and the accompanying differences, i.e. whether errors are more frequent with mismatches in word onsets (top cop), codas (top tock) or both (pop tot). Number of syllables (tippy ticky) and empty positions (top ta) were also varied. Since the gradient nature of errors can be difficult to determine acoustically, articulatory data were investigated. Articulator movements were recorded using electromagnetic articulography, for up to 9 speakers of American English repeatedly producing 2-word sequences to an accelerating metronome. Most word pairs showed more intrusions and greater variability in coda than in onset position, in contrast to the predominance of onset position errors in corpora from perceptual observation.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[2]  Marianne Pouplier,et al.  The role of a coda consonant as error trigger in repetition tasks , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[3]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  C. Browman,et al.  Some Notes on Syllable Structure in Articulatory Phonology , 1988, Phonetica.

[5]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Prosodic Frames in Speech Production , 2015 .

[6]  Anneke Slis,et al.  Articulatory variability and speech errors: An overview , 2018 .

[7]  L Saltzman Elliot,et al.  A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production , 1989 .

[8]  Carolyn E Wilshire,et al.  Serial order in phonological encoding: an exploration of the `word onset effect' using laboratory-induced errors , 1998, Cognition.

[9]  M. Crawley.  Mixed‐Effects Models , 2007 .

[10]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Richard Wright,et al.  The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[12]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[13]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data , 1981 .

[14]  Dani Byrd,et al.  A Phase Window Framework for Articulatory Timing , 1996, Phonology.

[15]  Pascal van Lieshout,et al.  The effect of phonetic context on the dynamics of intrusions and reductions , 2016, J. Phonetics.

[16]  Marie K. Huffman.  Segmental and prosodic effects on coda glottalization , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[17]  Marianne Pouplier,et al.  The Dynamics of Error , 2003 .

[18]  A. Meyer.  Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives , 1992, Cognition.

[19]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[20]  D. G. MacKay.  Spoonerisms: the structure of errors in the serial order of speech. , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  41 Peggy Babcock'S Relatives , 1980 .

[22]  Dani Byrd,et al.  The Distinctions Between State, Parameter and Graph Dynamics in Sensorimotor Control and Coordination , 2006 .

[23]  Natasha Warner,et al.  Phonetic variability of stops and flaps in spontaneous and careful speech. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors , 2007, Cognition.

[25]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[26]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Bridging planning and execution: Temporal planning of syllables , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[27]  Martin Corley,et al.  Cascading influences on the production of speech: Evidence from articulation , 2010, Cognition.

[28]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Spontaneous recruitment and annihilation of degrees of freedom in biological coordination , 1993 .

[29]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue , 1975 .

[30]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters , 2006 .

[31]  Catherine Phebe Browman,et al.  WPP, No. 42: Tip of the Tongue and Slip of the Ear: Implications for Language Processing , 1978 .

[32]  D. Meyer,et al.  Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features , 1985 .

[33]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Serial Control of Phonology in Speech Production: A Hierarchical Model , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Saying consonant clusters quickly , 1996 .

[35]  C. Browman,et al.  Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures , 2000 .

[36]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences , 1996 .

[37]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Effects of phonological competition on speech planning and execution , 2015, ICPhS.

[38]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[39]  Thomas Berg,et al.  Phonological processing in a syllable-timed language with pre-final stress: Evidence from spanish speech error data , 1991 .

[40]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias? , 2006 .

[41]  R A Mowrey,et al.  Phonological primitives: electromyographic speech error evidence. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Self-organization of Syllable Structure: a Coupled Oscillator Model , 2007 .

[43]  G. Dell,et al.  Representation of serial order in speech: evidence from the repeated phoneme effect in speech errors. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  M. Damian.  Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  Francis Nolan,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: The descriptive role of segments: evidence from assimilation , 1992 .

[46]  G. Dell,et al.  Syllable Structure in Speech Production: Are Syllables Chunks or Schemas? , 1995 .

[47]  George Houghton,et al.  The problem of serial order: a neural network model of sequence learning and recall , 1990 .

[48]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[49]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  The Temporal Organization of Speech , 2014 .

[50]  Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg,et al.  Phonological Competition within the Word: Evidence from the Phoneme Similarity Effect in Spoken Production. , 2012 .

[51]  V. Fromkin.  Speech errors as linguistic evidence , 1976 .

[52]  P. Hoole,et al.  Speaker‐specific kinematic properties of alveolar reductions in English and German , 2004, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[53]  V. Ferreira,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Language Production , 2014 .

[54]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Asymmetries in the perception of speech production errors , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[55]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[56]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Explaining Coronal Reduction: Prosodic Structure and Articulatory Posture , 2018, Phonetica.

[57]  Eric Keller,et al.  The Role of Word-Onset Consonants in Speech Production Planning: New Evidence from Speech Error Patterns , 2013 .

[58]  S. Shattuck-Hufnagel.  The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering , 1992, Cognition.

[59]  P. van Lieshout,et al.  The effect of phonetic context on speech movements in repetitive speech. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.