Damage Classification Structural Health Monitoring in Bolted Structures Using Time-frequency Techniques

The analysis, detection, and classification of damage in complex bolted structures is an important component of structural health monitoring. In this article, an advanced signal processing and classification method is introduced based on time-frequency techniques. The time-varying signals collected from sensors are decomposed into linear combinations of highly localized Gaussian functions using the matching pursuit decomposition algorithm. These functions are chosen from a dictionary of time-frequency shifted and scaled versions of an elementary Gaussian basis function. The dictionary is also modified to use real measured data as the basis elements in order to obtain a more parsimonious signal representation. Classification is then achieved by matching the extracted damage features in the time-frequency plane. To further improve classification performance, the information collected from multiple sensors is integrated using a Bayesian sensor fusion approach. Results are presented demonstrating the algorithm performance for classifying signals obtained from various types of fastener failure damage in an aluminum plate.

[1]  Antonia Papandreou-Suppappola,et al.  Classification of Acoustic Emissions Using Modified Matching Pursuit , 2004, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[2]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  Damage identification for composite structures with a Bayesian network , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing Conference, 2004..

[3]  R. Altes Detection, estimation, and classification with spectrograms , 1980 .

[4]  A.N. Srivastava,et al.  Classification of Damage Signatures in Composite Plates using One-Class SVMs , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[5]  Dimitrios Hatzinakos,et al.  Time-frequency analysis of sensor data for detection of structural damage in instrumented structures , 1997, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.

[6]  Antonia Papandreou-Suppappola,et al.  Applications in Time-Frequency Signal Processing , 2002 .

[7]  S. Grondel,et al.  Damage assessment in composites by Lamb waves and wavelet coefficients , 2003 .

[8]  Dionisio Bernal,et al.  An Examination of Instantaneous Frequency as a Damage Detection Tool , 2000 .

[9]  Antonia Papandreou-Suppappola,et al.  Analysis and classification of time-varying signals with multiple time-frequency structures , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[10]  Aboelmagd Noureldin,et al.  Wavelet Transform for Structural Health Monitoring: A Compendium of Uses and Features , 2006 .

[11]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  F. Hlawatsch,et al.  Linear and quadratic time-frequency signal representations , 1992, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[13]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  Statistical Wavelet-Based Method for Structural Health Monitoring , 2004 .

[14]  Vikram Pakrashi,et al.  Structural damage detection and calibration using a wavelet-kurtosis technique , 2007 .

[15]  Antonia Papandreou-Suppappola,et al.  On the use of the matching pursuit decomposition signal processing technique for structural health monitoring , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[16]  Leonid M. Gelman,et al.  Advantage of using the fourier components pair instead of power spectral density for fatigue crack diagnostics , 2004 .

[17]  Hyunjo Jeong,et al.  Fracture source location in thin plates using the wavelet transform of dispersive waves , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  Charles R Farrar,et al.  Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals , 2001 .

[20]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Pattern Recognition Techniques , 2001 .

[21]  D. Nix,et al.  Damage Identification with Linear Discriminant Operators , 1999 .

[22]  I. Vincent,et al.  Non stationary signals classification using time-frequency distributions , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time- Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis.

[23]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Bayesian probabilistic damage detection of a reinforced-concrete bridge column , 2000 .

[25]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[26]  Steven E. Olson,et al.  Fastener Damage Estimation in a Square Aluminum Plate , 2006 .

[27]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Overview of Piezoelectric Impedance-Based Health Monitoring and Path Forward , 2003 .

[28]  Leon Cohen,et al.  Time Frequency Analysis: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[29]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[30]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Structural damage classification using extreme value statistics , 2005 .

[31]  Aditi Chattopadhyay,et al.  Ultrasonic sensing and time-frequency analysis for detecting plastic deformation in an aluminum plate , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[32]  C. R. Farrar,et al.  Statistical damage identification techniques applied to the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande River , 1998 .

[33]  Antonia Papandreou-Suppappola,et al.  Physics based modeling for time-frequency damage classification , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[34]  Michael J. Devaney,et al.  Bearing damage detection via wavelet packet decomposition of the stator current , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.