Providing students with a head start through mentorship and systems thinking within a vertical design studio environment

With the globalisation of design, the creation of single-entity products would no longer meet the need for solving complex problems within an environment where technologies become more advanced and complex, and user needs more diverse. Competitive advantage will only be created through the development of innovative products, services and systems. Within the context of design education, today's challenge is to prepare future designers to operate efficiently and effectively in a design and development environment which is highly competitive, fluid and collaborative. This article discusses the potential of systems design to be implemented in a vertical studio teaching concept. A three-stage approach in the form of examples demonstrates how, at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and the National University of Singapore (NUS), an integrated studio teaching-mentorship has been adopted to prepare students early in their educational career for the design opportunities and challenges they will face after they have completed their studies. For the three-stage approach, the potential of adopting a vertical studio teaching concept is recommended, where curriculum amendments, course preparation, teamwork and the crafting of a detailed design assignment are crucial factors to determine its success. The results indicate the following: emphasis should be placed on strategic and systems design to facilitate innovation and the further development of design solutions beyond the studio environment; a pupil-mentorship programme should be developed to sustain collaboration beyond the studio; students need to be made aware of 'value chain alliances among collaborators' as a tool to achieve competitive advantage; the emerging need for cross-cultural design and manufacturing alliances should be reemphasised in the education of future designers.

[1]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[2]  Manlai You,et al.  Competencies and qualifications for industrial design jobs: implications for design practice, education, and student career guidance , 2005 .

[3]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[4]  Vesna Popovic,et al.  Expertise development in product design-strategic and domain-specific knowledge connections , 2004 .

[5]  Donald A. Schön Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[6]  Linda Ball,et al.  Preparing graduates in art and design to meet the challenges of working in the creative industries: a new model for work , 2002 .

[7]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[8]  Janet Blaich,et al.  Product Design and Corporate Strategy: Managing the Connection for Competitive Advantage , 1992 .

[9]  J. Tinsley,et al.  The mentoring partnership. , 2000, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[10]  N. F. M. Roozenburg,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[11]  Leonard J. Waks,et al.  Donald Schon's Philosophy of Design and Design Education , 2001 .

[12]  A. Sachdeva Preceptorship, mentorship, and the adult learner in medical and health sciences education. , 2009, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[13]  W. T. Singleton,et al.  Man-machine systems , 1974 .

[14]  Annaleena Hakatie,et al.  Managing Creativity: A Gap Analysis Approach to Identifying Challenges for Industrial Design Consultancy Services , 2007, Design Issues.

[15]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process , 1996 .

[16]  Philippa Ashton,et al.  Transforming design consultancies through learning , 2010 .

[17]  Kathy E. Kram,et al.  Reconceptualizing Mentoring at Work: A Developmental Network Perspective , 2001 .