As part of the Morphing Project in the Aerospace Vehicle Systems Technology Program, NASA is conducting biomimetics research aimed at the study of natural morphologies that may prove beneficial for advanced flight systems. Wind tunnel tests were conducted in 2002 to compare three biologically inspired wing designs with a planar elliptic wing; theoretically considered the best planar configuration for the least induced drag. All wings had the same aspect ratio and wing span. One of the wings, referred to as a Hyper-Elliptic Cambered Span (HECS) due to its continuously varying span-wise curvature, demonstrated that although it had nearly a 10 percent increase in surface area it provided a lift-to-drag increase of as much as 15 percent. Because of its beneficial aerodynamic properties, the Hyper-Elliptic Cambered Span wing has been chosen as a focus concept for wing morphing (continuous physical shape change) research. To be of potential use on a vehicle, morphing concepts must allow for adequate stability and control properties. Flight control designs must be validated in simulation and eventually in flight. This paper presents the development of a non-linear, CFDbased, dynamic vehicle simulation incorporating a morphable Hyper-Elliptic Cambered Span wing. This vehicle utilizes a continuous (hingeless, gapless) morphable panel along the trailing edge of the wing and a continuous moveable wing tip for pitch, roll, and yaw control. The simulation is used as the basis for the assessment of vehicle stability and control characteristics and the viability of using wing morphing for primary maneuver control. Linear state space models of the vehicle associated with typical trimmed level flight conditions are also presented.
[1]
C. W. Burkett.
Reductions in induced drag by the use of aft swept wing tips
,
1989,
The Aeronautical Journal (1968).
[2]
Raymond C. Montgomery,et al.
Determination of Stability and Control Derivatives using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Automatic Differentiation
,
1999
.
[3]
John B. Davidson,et al.
SIMULATION AND FLIGHT CONTROL OF AN AEROELASTIC FIXED WING MICRO AERIAL VEHICLE
,
2002
.
[4]
Dawn C. Jegley,et al.
Year 2000 Report of Findings From a Six-Month Survey
,
2002
.
[5]
Lawrence L. Green,et al.
STEADY-STATE COMPUTATION OF CONSTANT ROTATIONAL RATE DYNAMIC STABILITY DERIVATIVES
,
2000
.
[6]
Frank L. Lewis,et al.
Aircraft Control and Simulation
,
1992
.
[7]
C. D. Cone,et al.
THE THEORY OF INDUCED LIFT AND MINIMUM INDUCED DRAG OF NONPLANAR LIFTING SYSTEMS
,
1962
.
[8]
John B. Davidson,et al.
AIAA 2002-4875 Simulation and Flight Control of an Aeroelastic Fixed Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle
,
2002
.
[9]
W. K. Anderson,et al.
An implicit upwind algorithm for computing turbulent flows on unstructured grids
,
1994
.
[10]
Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.
Evaluating the Impact of Morphing Technologies on Aircraft Performance
,
2002
.
[11]
Aaron J. Ostroff,et al.
RECONFIGURABLE FLIGHT CONTROL USING NONLINEAR DYNAMIC INVERSION WITH A SPECIAL ACCELEROMETER IMPLEMENTATION
,
2000
.
[12]
Michael R. Dudley,et al.
Potential Flow Theory and Operation Guide for the Panel Code PMARC
,
1999
.
[13]
B. Holmes,et al.
Induced drag - Historical perspective
,
1989
.