Standing on the Shoulders of Citizens: Exploring Gameful Collaboration for Creating Social Experiments

There exists a gap in knowledge between scientists and the larger non-scientist public. Therefore, much of the information provided to the public regarding research that should influence their decisions is often misunderstood. In order to eliminate, or at the very least, minimize this gap, there is a need to educate non-scientists about research methods and experimental design. In order to address this need, we have created a digital game, Mad Science, that allows non-scientists to create and participate in experiments to better understand research methods. The current study analyses the results of a paper prototyping session, where non-scientists were asked to create experiments using the tools and scaffolding provided in the game. Participants were able to create playable scenarios and testable experiments. However, our results suggest a need for further AI support and scaffolding to address common areas of confusion and to facilitate the experimental design process.

[1]  Michael Mateas,et al.  Tanagra: Reactive Planning and Constraint Solving for Mixed-Initiative Level Design , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games.

[2]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[3]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[4]  Magy Seif El-Nasr,et al.  Game Analytics , 2013, Springer London.

[5]  Georgia Bracey,et al.  Citizen Science: Status and Research Directions for the Coming Decade , 2009 .

[6]  S. Wilson What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy , 2006 .

[7]  J. Silvertown A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Jaime R Carbonell,et al.  Mixed-initiative man-computer instructional dialogues , 1970 .

[9]  Katherine Isbister,et al.  Game Usability - Advice from the Experts for Advancing the Player Experience , 2008 .

[10]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[11]  James E. Driskell,et al.  Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model , 2002 .

[12]  Jaime R. Carbonell Mixed-Initiative Man-Computer Instructional Dialogues. Final Report. , 1970 .

[13]  I. Janis Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[14]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[15]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Gaming for (Citizen) Science: Exploring Motivation and Data Quality in the Context of Crowdsourced Science through the Design and Evaluation of a Social-Computational System , 2011, 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops.

[16]  R. Bonney,et al.  Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen‐science project , 2000 .

[17]  J. Cohn Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research? , 2008 .

[18]  K. Isbister,et al.  The Four Fun Keys , 2008 .

[19]  Casper Harteveld,et al.  Triadic Game Design - Balancing Reality, Meaning and Play , 2011 .

[20]  U. Dulleck,et al.  μ-σ Games , 2012, Games.

[21]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[22]  Steven C. Sutherland,et al.  The Goal of Scoring: Exploring the Role of Game Performance in Educational Games , 2015, CHI.

[23]  Tracy Fullerton,et al.  Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games, Third Edition , 2014 .

[24]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[26]  Adrien Treuille,et al.  Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game , 2010, Nature.