Predicting defibrillation success in sudden cardiac arrest patients.

Although the importance of quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and its link to survival is still emphasized, there has been recent debate about the balance between CPR and defibrillation, particularly for long response times. Defibrillation shocks for ventricular fibrillation (VF) of recently perfused hearts have high success for the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), but hearts with depleted adenosine triphosphate (ATP) stores have low recovery rates. Since quality CPR has been shown to both slow the degradation process and restore cardiac viability, a measurement of patient condition to optimize the timing of defibrillation shocks may improve outcomes compared to time-based protocols. Researchers have proposed numerous predictive features of VF and shockable ventricular tachycardia (VT) which can be computed from the electrocardiogram (ECG) signal to distinguish between the rhythms which convert to spontaneous circulation and those which do not. We looked at the shock-success prediction performance of thirteen of these features on a single evaluation database including the recordings from 116 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients which were collected for a separate study using defibrillators in ambulances and medical centers in 4 European regions and the US between March 2002 and September 2004. A total of 469 shocks preceded by VF or shockable VT rhythm episodes were identified in the recordings. Based on the experts' annotation for the post-shock rhythm, the shocks were categorized to result in either pulsatile (ROSC) or non-pulsatile (no-ROSC) rhythm. The features were calculated on a 4-second ECG segment prior to the shock delivery. These features examined were: Mean Amplitude, Average Peak-Peak Amplitude, Amplitude Range, Amplitude Spectrum Analysis (AMSA), Peak Frequency, Centroid Frequency, Spectral Flatness Measure (SFM), Energy, Max Power, Centroid Power, Power Spectrum Analysis (PSA), Mean Slope, and Median Slope. Statistical hypothesis tests (two-tailed t-test and Wilcoxon with 5% significance level) were applied to determine if the means and medians of these features were significantly different between the ROSC and no-ROSC groups. The ROC curve was computed for each feature, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) was calculated. Specificity (Sp) with Sensitivity (Se) held at 90% as well as Se with Sp held at 90% was also computed. All features showed statistically different mean and median values between the ROSC and no-ROSC groups with all p-values less than 0.0001. The AUC was >76% for all features. For Sp = 90%, the Se range was 33-45%; for Se = 90%, the Sp range was 49-63%. The features showed good shock-success prediction performance. We believe that a defibrillator employing a clinical decision tool based on these features has the potential to improve overall survival from cardiac arrest.

[1]  G A Ewy,et al.  Depletion of myocardial adenosine triphosphate during prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation: effect on defibrillation success. , 1990, Resuscitation.

[2]  M. Copass,et al.  Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation , 1999, JAMA.

[3]  Wanchun Tang,et al.  Predicting the success of defibrillation by electrocardiographic analysis. , 2002, Resuscitation.

[4]  S. O. Aase,et al.  Predicting Outcome of Defibrillation by Spectral Characterization and Nonparametric Classification of Ventricular Fibrillation in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2000, Circulation.

[5]  R. Page,et al.  Automated External Defibrillators: Technical Considerations and Clinical Promise , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  L. Morrison,et al.  Part 6: Defibrillation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Circulation.

[7]  F A Hamprecht,et al.  Preliminary results on the prediction of countershock success with fibrillation power. , 2001, Resuscitation.

[8]  M H Weil,et al.  Optimizing timing of ventricular defibrillation , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[9]  Jo Kramer-Johansen,et al.  Shock outcome is related to prior rhythm and duration of ventricular fibrillation. , 2007, Resuscitation.

[10]  Irena Jekova,et al.  Defibrillation shock success estimation by a set of six parameters derived from the electrocardiogram , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[11]  R. Berg,et al.  Predictors of resuscitation in a swine model of ischemic and nonischemic ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest: Superiority of amplitude spectral area and slope to predict a return of spontaneous circulation when resuscitation efforts are prolonged* , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[12]  M. Hazinski,et al.  Part 11: Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Circulation.

[13]  C W Otto,et al.  Influence of time and therapy on ventricular defibrillation in dogs , 1980, Critical care medicine.

[14]  S. O. Aase,et al.  Spectral characterization of ECG in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients , 1999, Computers in Cardiology 1999. Vol.26 (Cat. No.99CH37004).

[15]  Kayvan Najarian,et al.  Non-linear dynamical signal characterization for prediction of defibrillation success through machine learning , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[16]  Roger D. White,et al.  Analysis of the ventricular fibrillation waveform in refibrillation , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[17]  P. Steen,et al.  Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[18]  Lance B Becker,et al.  Resuscitation after cardiac arrest: a 3-phase time-sensitive model. , 2002, JAMA.

[19]  T. Eftestøl,et al.  Identifying approaches to improve the accuracy of shock outcome prediction for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2008, Resuscitation.

[20]  Trygve Eftestøl,et al.  Prediction of countershock success using single features from multiple ventricular fibrillation frequency bands and feature combinations using neural networks. , 2007, Resuscitation.

[21]  Trygve Eftestøl,et al.  Development of the probability of return of spontaneous circulation in intervals without chest compressions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study , 2009, BMC medicine.

[22]  M. Kurz,et al.  WORKSHEET for Evidence-Based Review of Science for Emergency Cardiac Care , 2009 .