An Empirical Analysis of Virtual Goods Permission Rights and Pricing Strategies

With the rapid development of the virtual world industry in the past few years, trading of virtual goods and services has grown significantly. Virtual goods creators can set different permissions to their creations, such as the length of usage, the ability to copy or modify a virtual good, or the ability to give the good to others. The permissions of virtual goods endow their creators with additional power to control the allocation and exchange of virtual goods in a virtual world. This paper examines how the unique virtual goods permission settings (Copy, Modify, and Transfer) and other factors are associated with virtual goods prices. Using data from a Second Life marketplace, we find that permissions of virtual goods are not random, as creators strategically set the permissions for their virtual creations. Our results show that the Copy and Transfer permissions are significant factors associated with virtual goods prices. The impact of other factors on virtual goods prices is analyzed and managerial implications are discussed.

[1]  Norris I. Bruce,et al.  Seller rating, price, and default in online auctions , 2004 .

[2]  Paul Belleflamme Pricing Information Goods in the Presence of Copying , 2002 .

[3]  Cory Ondrejka,et al.  Collapsing Geography (Second Life, Innovation, and the Future of National Power) , 2007, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[4]  Zhongju Zhang,et al.  Why give away something for nothing? Investigating virtual goods pricing and permission strategies , 2010, TMIS.

[5]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures , 2007 .

[6]  H. Varian BUYING, SHARING AND RENTING INFORMATION GOODS* , 2003 .

[7]  Ivan Png,et al.  Information Goods Pricing and Copyright Enforcement: Welfare Analysis , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[9]  Bin Gu,et al.  Do online reviews matter? - An empirical investigation of panel data , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  N. Lee,et al.  Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network , 2007 .

[11]  Christoph Lattemann,et al.  USER ACCEPTANCE OF VIRTUAL WORLDS , 2008 .

[12]  James R. Marsden,et al.  Consumer Search and Retailer Strategies in the Presence of Online Music Sharing , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  E. H. Simpson,et al.  The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables , 1951 .

[14]  Theo Papadopoulos,et al.  Pricing and pirate product market formation , 2004 .

[15]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  Testing Transformations to Normality , 1973 .

[16]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  LEADERSHIP'S Online Labs , 2008 .

[17]  Hsing Kenneth Cheng,et al.  Optimal Software Free Trial Strategy: The Impact of Network Externalities and Consumer Uncertainty , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  K. R. Conner,et al.  Obtaining Strategic Advantage from Being Imitated: When Can Encouraging Clones Pay? , 1995 .

[19]  Vili Lehdonvirta,et al.  Virtual item sales as a revenue model: identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions , 2009, Electron. Commer. Res..

[20]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Willingness to Pay in an Open Source Software Environment , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Ashleigh K. Shelton Defining the lines between virtual and real world purchases: Second Life sells, but who's buying? , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  A. Sundararajan,et al.  Are Digital Rights Valuable? Theory and Evidence from Ebook Pricing , 2010 .

[23]  Shivendu Shivendu,et al.  Managing Piracy: Pricing and Sampling Strategies for Digital Experience Goods in Vertically Segmented Markets , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  R. Watson,et al.  THE WORLD WIDE WEB AS AN ADVERTISING MEDIUM , 1996 .

[25]  Michele D. Dickey Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Research Note - When Is Versioning Optimal for Information Goods? , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Andrew Whinston,et al.  The Dynamics of Online Word-of-Mouth and Product Sales: An Empirical Investigation of the Movie Industry , 2008 .

[28]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Hsing Kenneth Cheng,et al.  Free Trial or No Free Trial: Optimal Software Product Design with Network Effects , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Enhancing the understanding of genres of web-based communities: the role of the ecological cognition framework , 2008, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[31]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Why people buy virtual items in virtual worlds with real money , 2007, DATB.

[32]  Yong Liu Word-of-Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue , 2006 .

[33]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[34]  Lakshman Krishnamurthi,et al.  The Effect of Advertising on Consumer Price Sensitivity , 1985 .

[35]  R. Plackett,et al.  Karl Pearson and the Chi-squared Test , 1983 .

[36]  Sung-Byung Yang,et al.  An Odyssey into Virtual Worlds: Exploring the Impacts of Technological and Spatial Environments , 2011, MIS Q..

[37]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits and Efficiency , 1998 .