Investigating the use of an adjustment task to set the preferred illuminance in a workplace environment

An experiment was carried out to examine user preferences for light level using the method of adjustment. The study sought preferred illuminances under lighting from fluorescent lamps of different correlated colour temperature. It was hypothesised that the preferred illuminance would be influenced by variables inherent in the experimental design including the available stimulus range, the anchor (initial setting before adjustment) and adaptation time before onset of adjustment action. The experiment included three different stimulus ranges (21–482 lux, 38–906 lux and 72–1307 lux) and these lead to significantly different preferred illuminances (337 lux, 523 lux and 645 lux, respectively). The experimental results confirmed that stimulus range and anchor have significant effects on the outcome of the adjustment task, confirming the importance of considering and reporting these variables when determining user preference with this method.

[1]  E. Poulton.  Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading* , 1977 .

[2]  Steve Fotios,et al.  Lamp colour properties and apparent brightness: a review , 2001 .

[3]  I. L. Bailey,et al.  Large area glare sources and their effect on visual discomfort and visual performance at computer workstations , 1992, Conference Record of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[4]  Peter Boyce,et al.  Individual Lighting Control: Task Performance, Mood, and Illuminance , 2000 .

[5]  Henri Juslén,et al.  Preferred task-lighting levels in an industrial work area without daylight , 2005 .

[6]  Steve Fotios,et al.  Research Methods to Avoid Bias in Categorical Ratings of Brightness , 2009 .

[7]  R. M. Boynton.  Human color vision , 1979 .

[8]  R. Gregory.  Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing , 1966 .

[9]  Jens Christoffersen,et al.  Dynamic Lighting Concept in Danish Office Environment with Daylight Contribution , 2010 .

[10]  Steve Fotios,et al.  Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments , 2010 .

[11]  P. Boyce,et al.  Effect of correlated colour temperature on the perception of interiors and colour discrimination performance , 1990 .

[12]  K. Zener,et al.  The method of absolute judgment in psychophysics. , 1928 .

[13]  Sven Hesselgren,et al.  The Language of Architecture , 2020, Advances in Systems Analysis, Software Engineering, and High Performance Computing.

[14]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras , 2006 .

[15]  Dj Carter,et al.  Long-term patterns of use of occupant controlled office lighting , 2003 .

[16]  Tharinee Ramasoot.  Investigation of lighting and disturbing reflections on display screens : a new model for judging acceptability , 2010 .

[17]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  The long and short of it: physical anchoring effects , 2006 .

[18]  Jennifer A. Veitch,et al.  Preferred luminous conditions in open-plan offices: research and practice recommendations , 2000 .

[19]  A R Wilkes,et al.  Minimum and optimum light output of Macintosh size 3 laryngoscopy blades: a manikin study * , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[20]  A. Parducci.  Learning variables in the judgment of single stimuli. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[22]  A. Kruithof.  Tubular luminescence lamps for general illumination , 1941 .

[23]  S. Link,et al.  Bias in Quantifying Judgments , 1989 .

[24]  D. K. Tiller,et al.  Higher Color Temperature Lamps May Not Appear Brighter , 2006 .

[25]  Peter Boyce,et al.  Occupant use of switching and dimming controls in offices , 2006 .

[26]  G. Gescheider.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[27]  W. A. Hunt,et al.  The Anchoring of an Affective Scale , 1937 .