Added value of integrated circuit detector in head CT: objective and subjective image quality in comparison to conventional detector design.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES A new computed tomography (CT) detector with integrated electric components and shorter conducting pathways has recently been introduced to decrease system inherent electronic noise. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential benefit of such integrated circuit detector (ICD) in head CT by comparing objective and subjective image quality in low-dose examinations with a conventional detector design. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a conventional detector, reduced-dose noncontrast head CT (255 mAs; effective dose, 1.7 mSv) was performed in 25 consecutive patients. Following transition to ICD, 25 consecutive patients were scanned using identical imaging parameters. Images in both groups were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP) and assessed in terms of quantitative and qualitative image quality. RESULTS Acquisition of head CT using ICD increased signal-to-noise ratio of gray and white matter by 14% (10.0 ± 1.6 vs. 11.4 ± 2.5; P = .02) and 17% (8.2 ± 0.8 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5; P = .000). The associated improvement in contrast-to-noise ratio was 12% (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6; P = .121). In addition, there was a 51% increase in objective image sharpness (582 ± 85 vs. 884.5 ± 191; change in HU/Pixel; P < .000). Compared to standard acquisitions, subjective grading of noise and overall image quality scores were significantly improved with ICD (2.1 ± 0.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3; P < .000; 2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3; P = .001). Moreover, streak artifacts in the posterior fossa were substantially reduced (2.3 ± 0.7 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS At the same radiation level, acquisition of head CT with ICD achieves superior objective and subjective image quality and provides potential for significant dose reduction.

[1]  J. Slotboom,et al.  Dose Reduction in Standard Head CT: First Results from a New Scanner Using Iterative Reconstruction and a New Detector Type in Comparison with Two Previous Generations of Multi-slice CT , 2013, Clinical Neuroradiology.

[2]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Stenosis Quantification in Coronary CT Angiography: Impact of an Integrated Circuit Detector With Iterative Reconstruction , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[3]  G. Erbaş,et al.  Lowering the Dose in Head CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[4]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Electronic noise in CT detectors: Impact on image noise and artifacts. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  C D Claussen,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction in Head CT: Image Quality of Routine and Low-Dose Protocols in Comparison with Standard Filtered Back-Projection , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions , 2012, European Radiology.

[9]  G A Vorona,et al.  The Use of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Pediatric Head CT: A Feasibility Study , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[10]  T. Flohr,et al.  Sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in head CT: improvement of objective and subjective image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[11]  B. Whiting,et al.  Validation of CT dose-reduction simulation. , 2008, Medical physics.

[12]  Sebastian Bickelhaupt,et al.  Integrated circuit detector technology in abdominal CT: added value in obese patients. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Marc Kachelriess,et al.  Direct comparison of a xenon and a solid-state CT detector system: measurements under working conditions , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  D J Brenner,et al.  Slowing the Increase in the Population Dose Resulting from CT Scans , 2010, Radiation research.

[15]  P C Shrimpton,et al.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  N. Bellenger,et al.  A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography , 2010, Heart.

[17]  J. Hsieh,et al.  Investigation of a solid-state detector for advanced computed tomography , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  D. Sahani,et al.  Cranial CT with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction: Improved Image Quality with Concomitant Radiation Dose Reduction , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Reducing Image Noise in Computed Tomography (CT) Colonography: Effect of an Integrated Circuit CT Detector , 2014, Journal of computer assisted tomography.