Modified Phase-Scheduled-Command FxLMS Algorithm for Active Sound Profiling

Active sound profiling, or active noise equalization strategies have been proposed to achieve spectral shaping of a primary disturbance signal. The control algorithms proposed to achieve such spectral shaping have either suffered from poor robustness to plant modeling uncertainties or required high levels of control effort. To improve the robustness of active sound profiling to uncertainties in the plant model, while avoiding increased control effort, a modified phase-scheduled-command filtered-x least-mean-square algorithm is proposed in this paper. The new algorithm provides improved stability, while requiring the minimum control effort. This improvement is achieved by replacing the plant model with an intelligent adaptive-hysteresis switching mechanism to allow the necessary estimation of the disturbance signal phase. The improved performance and robustness of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated through a series of simulations using measured acoustic responses.

[1]  S. Elliott,et al.  In-flight experiments on the active control of propeller-induced cabin noise , 1989 .

[2]  Sen M. Kuo,et al.  Development and analysis of an adaptive noise equalizer , 1995, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[3]  Wim Desmet,et al.  A multichannel amplitude and relative-phase controller for active sound quality control , 2014 .

[4]  Philip A. Nelson,et al.  Theoretical studies of the active control of propeller-induced cabin noise , 1990 .

[5]  Edgar Sanchez-Sinencio,et al.  A 4-D chaotic oscillator based on a differential hysteresis comparator , 1998 .

[6]  Ganapati Panda,et al.  Advances in active noise control: A survey, with emphasis on recent nonlinear techniques , 2013, Signal Process..

[7]  Sen M. Kuo,et al.  Development of adaptive algorithm for active sound quality control , 2007 .

[8]  Woon-Seng Gan,et al.  Recent advances on active noise control: open issues and innovative applications , 2012, APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing.

[9]  Jordan Cheer,et al.  Active noise control of a diesel generator in a luxury yacht , 2016 .

[10]  S. J. Elliott,et al.  Adaptive algorithms for active sound-profiling , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[11]  Jordan Cheer,et al.  The design and performance of feedback controllers for the attenuation of road noise in vehicles , 2014 .

[12]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Active sound quality control of engine induced cavity noise , 2009 .

[13]  Matthew A. Franchek,et al.  Hybrid noise control in ducts , 2000 .

[14]  P. Nelson,et al.  Active noise control in finite length ducts , 1983 .

[15]  Stephen J. Elliott,et al.  Signal Processing for Active Control , 2000 .

[16]  Stephen J. Elliott,et al.  A multiple error LMS algorithm and its application to the active control of sound and vibration , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[17]  Sen M. Kuo,et al.  Active Noise Control Systems: Algorithms and DSP Implementations , 1996 .

[18]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[19]  Jordan Cheer,et al.  Multichannel control systems for the attenuation of interior road noise in vehicles , 2015 .

[20]  Philip A. Nelson,et al.  Active Control of Sound , 1992 .