Quantification of Social Behavior in D. discoideum Reveals Complex Fixed and Facultative Strategies

Understanding the maintenance of cooperation requires an understanding of the nature of cheaters and the strategies used to mitigate their effects. However, it is often difficult to determine how cheating or differential social success has arisen. For example, cheaters may employ different strategies (e.g., fixed and facultative), whereas other causes of unequal fitness in social situations can result in winners and losers without cheating. To address these problems, we quantified the social success of naturally occurring genotypes of Dictyostelium discoideum during the formation of chimeric fruiting bodies, consisting of dead stalk cells and viable spores. We demonstrate that an apparent competitive dominance hierarchy of spore formation in chimera is partly due to a fixed strategy where genotypes exhibit dramatically different spore allocations. However, we also find complex, variable facultative strategies, where genotypes change their allocation in chimera. By determining the magnitude and direction of these changes, we partition facultative cheating into two forms: (1) promotion of individual fitness through selfish behaviour ("self-promotion") and (2) coercion of other genotypes to act cooperatively. Our results demonstrate and define social interactions between D. discoideum isolates, thus providing a conceptual framework for the study of the genetic mechanisms that underpin social evolution.

[1]  M. Watve,et al.  Altruist Cheater Dynamics in Dictyostelium: Aggregated Distribution Gives Stable Oscillations , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Anup Parikh,et al.  Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae , 2008, Nature.

[3]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[4]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Single-Gene Greenbeard Effects in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Science.

[5]  J. Strassmann,et al.  A linear dominance hierarchy among clones in chimeras of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[6]  J. Woodgett,et al.  Glycogen synthase kinase-3 ( GSK-3 ) is regulated during Dictyostelium development via the serpentine receptor cAR 3 , 1998 .

[7]  W. Rice,et al.  The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  R. Kay,et al.  The role of DIF-1 signaling in Dictyostelium development. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[9]  A. Griffin,et al.  Social semantics : altruism , cooperation , mutualism , strong reciprocity and group selection , 2007 .

[10]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Co‐occurrence in nature of different clones of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[11]  D. Roze,et al.  Altruism, Cheating, and Anticheater Adaptations in Cellular Slime Molds , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[12]  J. Woodgett,et al.  Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) is regulated during Dictyostelium development via the serpentine receptor cAR3. , 1999, Development.

[13]  Kevin R Foster,et al.  High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  R. Firtel,et al.  Insights into morphogenesis from a simple developmental system , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  K. Foster,et al.  Pleiotropy as a mechanism to stabilize cooperation , 2004, Nature.

[16]  K. Foster,et al.  Diminishing returns in social evolution: the not‐so‐tragic commons , 2004, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  D A Knecht,et al.  Three-dimensional localization of wild-type and myosin II mutant cells during morphogenesis of Dictyostelium. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[18]  Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al.  Worker policing in the honeybee , 1989, Nature.

[19]  Gad Shaulsky,et al.  bZIP transcription factor interactions regulate DIF responses in Dictyostelium , 2006, Development.

[20]  W F Loomis,et al.  Lateral inhibition and pattern formation in Dictyostelium. , 1993, Current topics in developmental biology.

[21]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Kin Discrimination Increases with Genetic Distance in a Social Amoeba , 2008, PLoS biology.

[22]  K. Foster,et al.  The costs and benefits of being a chimera , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Social evolution: Kin preference in a social microbe , 2006, Nature.