AN EFFICIENT AUTOMATED VALIDATION PROCEDURE FOR EXOPLANET TRANSIT CANDIDATES

Surveys searching for transiting exoplanets have found many more candidates than they have been able to confirm as true planets. This situation is especially acute with the Kepler survey, which has found over 2300 candidates but has to date confirmed only a small fraction of them as planets. I present here a general procedure that can quickly be applied to any planet candidate to calculate its false positive probability. This procedure takes into account the period, depth, duration, and shape of the signal; the colors of the target star; arbitrary spectroscopic or imaging follow-up observations; and informed assumptions about the populations and distributions of field stars and multiple-star properties. Applying these methods to a sample of known Kepler planets, I demonstrate that many signals can be validated with very limited follow-up observations: in most cases with only a spectrum and an adaptive optics image. Additionally, I demonstrate that this procedure can reliably identify false positive signals. Because of the computational efficiency of this analysis, it is feasible to apply it to all Kepler planet candidates in the near future, and it will streamline the follow-up efforts for Kepler and other current and future transit surveys.

[1]  T. Brown,et al.  Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star , 1999, The Astrophysical journal.

[2]  R. P. Butler,et al.  A Transiting “51 Peg-like” Planet , 2000, The Astrophysical journal.

[3]  E. Agol,et al.  Analytic Light Curves for Planetary Transit Searches , 2002, astro-ph/0210099.

[4]  F. Allard,et al.  Evolutionary models for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs: uncertainties and limits at very young ages , 2002 .

[5]  L. Girardi,et al.  Theoretical isochrones in several photometric systems I. Johnson-Cousins-Glass, HST/WFPC2, HST/NICMOS, Washington, and ESO Imaging Survey filter sets , 2002, astro-ph/0205080.

[6]  S. Seager,et al.  A Unique Solution of Planet and Star Parameters from an Extrasolar Planet Transit Light Curve , 2002, astro-ph/0206228.

[7]  Timothy M. Brown,et al.  Expected Detection and False Alarm Rates for Transiting Jovian Planets , 2003, astro-ph/0307256.

[8]  Drake Deming,et al.  Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets , 2003 .

[9]  Berkeley,et al.  TESTING BLEND SCENARIOS FOR EXTRASOLAR TRANSITING PLANET CANDIDATES. I. OGLE-TR-33: A FALSE POSITIVE , 2004 .

[10]  David Charbonneau,et al.  TrES-1: The Transiting Planet of a Bright K0 V Star , 2004 .

[11]  Debra A. Fischer,et al.  A Neptune-Mass Planet Orbiting the Nearby M Dwarf GJ 436 , 2004 .

[12]  Berkeley,et al.  Testing Blend Scenarios for Extrasolar Transiting Planet Candidates. II. OGLE-TR-56 , 2005 .

[13]  Michel Mayor,et al.  ELODIE metallicity-biased search for transiting Hot Jupiters. II. A very hot Jupiter transiting the bright K star HD 189733 , 2005 .

[14]  E. Hatziminaoglou,et al.  Star counts in the Galaxy - Simulating from very deep to very shallow photometric surveys with the TRILEGAL code , 2005, astro-ph/0504047.

[15]  The N2K Consortium. II. A Transiting Hot Saturn around HD 149026 with a Large Dense Core , 2005, astro-ph/0507009.

[16]  J. E. Stys,et al.  A Transiting Planet of a Sun-like Star , 2006 .

[17]  Stefano Casertano,et al.  Transiting extrasolar planetary candidates in the Galactic bulge , 2006, Nature.

[18]  S. Udry,et al.  Tertiary Companions to Close Spectroscopic Binaries , 2006, astro-ph/0601518.

[19]  Carnegie,et al.  HAT-P-1b: A Large-Radius, Low-Density Exoplanet Transiting One Member of a Stellar Binary* ** , 2007 .

[20]  Darko Jevremovic,et al.  The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database , 2008, 0804.4473.

[21]  B. Gaudi,et al.  Predicting the Yields of Photometric Surveys for Transiting Extrasolar Planets , 2008, 0804.1150.

[22]  K. Apps,et al.  ON THE METAL RICHNESS OF M DWARFS WITH PLANETS , 2009, 0904.3092.

[23]  Russel J. White,et al.  A SURVEY OF STELLAR FAMILIES: MULTIPLICITY OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS , 2009, 1007.0414.

[24]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  MODELING KEPLER TRANSIT LIGHT CURVES AS FALSE POSITIVES: REJECTION OF BLEND SCENARIOS FOR KEPLER-9, AND VALIDATION OF KEPLER-9 d, A SUPER-EARTH-SIZE PLANET IN A MULTIPLE SYSTEM , 2010, 1008.4393.

[25]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  The Occurrence and Mass Distribution of Close-in Super-Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters , 2010, Science.

[26]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  Kepler-9: A System of Multiple Planets Transiting a Sun-Like Star, Confirmed by Timing Variations , 2010, Science.

[27]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  KEPLER-18b, c, AND d: A SYSTEM OF THREE PLANETS CONFIRMED BY TRANSIT TIMING VARIATIONS, LIGHT CURVE VALIDATION, WARM-SPITZER PHOTOMETRY, AND RADIAL VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS , 2011, 1110.0820.

[28]  Jie Li,et al.  THE KEPLER-19 SYSTEM: A TRANSITING 2.2 R⊕ PLANET AND A SECOND PLANET DETECTED VIA TRANSIT TIMING VARIATIONS , 2011, 1109.1561.

[29]  John Asher Johnson,et al.  ON THE LOW FALSE POSITIVE PROBABILITIES OF KEPLER PLANET CANDIDATES , 2011, 1101.5630.

[30]  A. Youdin.  THE EXOPLANET CENSUS: A GENERAL METHOD APPLIED TO KEPLER , 2011, 1105.1782.

[31]  M. R. Haas,et al.  A closely packed system of low-mass, low-density planets transiting Kepler-11 , 2011, Nature.

[32]  F. Fressin,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. II. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF DATA , 2011, 1102.0541.

[33]  K. Covey,et al.  CHARACTERIZING THE COOL KOIs. III. KOI 961: A SMALL STAR WITH LARGE PROPER MOTION AND THREE SMALL PLANETS , 2012, 1201.2189.

[34]  John Asher Johnson,et al.  THE FREQUENCY OF HOT JUPITERS ORBITING NEARBY SOLAR-TYPE STARS , 2012, 1205.2273.

[35]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  TRANSIT TIMING OBSERVATIONS FROM KEPLER. II. CONFIRMATION OF TWO MULTIPLANET SYSTEMS VIA A NON-PARAMETRIC CORRELATION ANALYSIS , 2012, 1201.5409.

[36]  M. R. Haas,et al.  PLANET OCCURRENCE WITHIN 0.25 AU OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS FROM KEPLER , 2011, 1103.2541.

[37]  Eric B. Ford,et al.  Constraining the false positive rate for Kepler planet candidates with multicolour photometry from the GTC , 2012, 1207.2481.

[38]  Batavia,et al.  Transit timing observations from Kepler - III. : Confirmation of four multiple planet systems by a Fourier-domain study of anticorrelated transit timing variations , 2012, 1201.5412.

[39]  C. Moutou,et al.  SOPHIE velocimetry of Kepler transit candidates VII. A false-positive rate of 35% for Kepler close-in giant candidates , 2012, 1206.0601.

[40]  Keivan G. Stassun,et al.  KELT-1b: A STRONGLY IRRADIATED, HIGHLY INFLATED, SHORT PERIOD, 27 JUPITER-MASS COMPANION TRANSITING A MID-F STAR , 2012 .

[41]  K. Ulaczyk,et al.  One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations , 2012, Nature.

[42]  M. R. Haas,et al.  TRANSIT TIMING OBSERVATIONS FROM KEPLER. IV. CONFIRMATION OF FOUR MULTIPLE-PLANET SYSTEMS BY SIMPLE PHYSICAL MODELS , 2012, 1201.5415.

[43]  F. Fressin,et al.  THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE OF KEPLER AND THE OCCURRENCE OF PLANETS , 2013, 1301.0842.