Statistical analysis of dipolarizations using spacecraft closely separated along Z in the near-Earth magnetotail

[1] The THEMIS mission includes three closely separated probes that provide the opportunity to analyze the small and meso-scale dynamics of the cross-tail current sheet in the near-Earth magnetosphere (10 Re). In this study, we focus on dipolarization events which occurred when two of these satellites were: (1) separated only along the Z direction (i.e., at the same location in the XYGSM) plane, and: (2) on separate sides of the neutral sheet. Following these criteria, our search resulted in 25 dipolarization events. Most of them were not associated with global auroral substorm but were rather associated with arc intensification and magnetic perturbation observed from the ground only in limited local time sectors. Based on these, we demonstrate that dipolarizations systematically correspond to a thickening of the current sheet rather than any other phenomena (e.g., flapping). We also show that the current density in the sheet systematically decreases after onset. Most of the events show an increase of the Laplace force and of the magnetic tension after the dipolarization onset. This trend is however, sensitive to the coordinate system chosen (i.e., GSM or SM). We find that the total energy density (total pressure) increases after 70% of the dipolarization events. However, when excluding the Z-component of the magnetic field (which is canceled by the dominant curvature terms) from the pressure, we find that the pressure decreases after 64% of events, and the remaining pressure increases occur closest to the neutral sheet. Five minutes averages are used 5 to 10 min before dipolarization and 10 to 15 min after dipolarization. We discuss the importance of both the spacecraft location relative to the neutral sheet and timescales chosen when calculating the pressure changes. These directly impact interpretations relative to dipolarization models.

[1]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  Dynamics of plasma, energetic particles, and fields near synchronous orbit in the nighttime sector during magnetospheric substorms , 1980 .

[2]  Nikolai A. Tsyganenko,et al.  Determination of the magnetospheric current system parameters and development of experimental geomagnetic field models based on data from IMP and HEOS satellites , 1982 .

[3]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  On the nature of precursor flows upstream of advancing dipolarization fronts , 2011 .

[4]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Current carriers near dipolarization fronts in the magnetotail: A THEMIS event study , 2011 .

[5]  R. Abiad,et al.  The THEMIS ESA Plasma Instrument and In-flight Calibration , 2008 .

[6]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  Fast flow during current sheet thinning , 2002 .

[7]  Baptiste Cecconi,et al.  AMDA, Automated Multi-Dataset Analysis: A Web-Based Service Provided by the CDPP , 2010 .

[8]  C. Russell,et al.  Radial expansion of the tail current disruption during substorms: A new approach to the substorm onset region , 1992 .

[9]  Werner Magnes,et al.  The THEMIS Fluxgate Magnetometer , 2008 .

[10]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Structure, force balance, and evolution of incompressible cross‐tail current sheet thinning , 2011 .

[11]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  On the force balance around dipolarization fronts within bursty bulk flows , 2011 .

[12]  C. Russell,et al.  Current carriers in the near-earth cross-tail current sheet during substorm growth phase , 1990 .

[13]  B. Anderson,et al.  Current disruptions in the near-Earth neutral sheet region , 1992 .

[14]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  Tailward propagating cross‐tail current disruption and dynamics of near‐Earth Tail: A multi‐point measurement analysis , 1993 .

[15]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Substorm onset by new plasma intrusion: THEMIS spacecraft observations , 2010 .

[16]  P. Louarn,et al.  On the propagation of low‐frequency fluctuations in the plasma sheet: 1. Cluster observations and magnetohydrodynamic analysis , 2004 .

[17]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Kinetic structure of the sharp injection/dipolarization front in the flow‐braking region , 2009 .

[18]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Plasma sheet thickness during a bursty bulk flow reversal , 2009 .

[19]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  Location and propagation of the magnetotail current disruption during substorm expansion: Analysis and simulation of an ISEE multi-onset event , 1991 .

[20]  E. G. Harris On a plasma sheath separating regions of oppositely directed magnetic field , 1962 .