Linguistic probabilities: theory and application

Over the past two decades a number of different approaches to “fuzzy probabilities” have been presented. The use of the same term masks fundamental differences. This paper surveys these different theories, contrasting and relating them to one another. Problems with these existing approaches are noted and a theory of “linguistic probabilities” is developed, which seeks to retain the underlying insights of existing work whilst remedying its technical defects. It is shown how the axiomatic theory of linguistic probabilities can be used to develop linguistic Bayesian networks which have a wide range of practical applications. To illustrate this a detailed and realistic example in the domain of forensic statistics is presented.

[1]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[2]  Dw Van Boxel,et al.  Probabilistic Expert Systems for Forensic Inference from Genetic Markers , 2002 .

[3]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy probabilities , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Stochastic sensitivity analysis using fuzzy influence diagrams , 2013, UAI.

[5]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Case pre-assessment and review in a two-way transfer case , 1999 .

[6]  Jeroen Keppens,et al.  Linguistic Bayesian Networks for reasoning with subjective probabilities in forensic statistics , 2003, ICAIL.

[7]  Qiang Shen,et al.  Towards a linguistic probability theory , 2002, 2002 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. 2002 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. FUZZ-IEEE'02. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37291).

[8]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  I. Evett,et al.  A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework , 1998 .

[10]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  A behavioural model for vague probability assessments , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[11]  J A Lambert,et al.  The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[12]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Inference in Forensic Identification , 1995 .

[13]  Alf C. Zimmer,et al.  What Uncertainty Judgments Can Tell About the Underlying Subjective Probabilities , 1985, UAI.

[14]  H. Tanaka,et al.  A Formulation of Fuzzy Decision Problems with Fuzzy Information using Probability Measures of Fuzzy Events , 1978, Inf. Control..

[15]  I. Evett,et al.  More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[16]  Qiang Shen,et al.  From approximative to descriptive fuzzy classifiers , 2002, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[17]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems , 1988 .

[18]  Dominic Welsh,et al.  Probability: An Introduction , 1986 .

[19]  J A Lambert,et al.  A model for case assessment and interpretation. , 1998, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[20]  D. Budescu,et al.  Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases , 1985 .

[21]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - II , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Alf Zimmer,et al.  Verbal Vs. Numerical Processing of Subjective Probabilities , 1983 .

[23]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy logic = computing with words , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[24]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Measuring the Vague Meanings of Probability Terms , 1986 .

[25]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[26]  Paolo Garbolino,et al.  A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.