Hydrologic coupling of slopes, riparian zones and streams: an example from the Canadian Shield

Streamflow generation at the basin scale is dictated by the differential ability of landscape elements to generate runoff and the degree of hydrologic integration of these elements. There is increasing use of hydrological models that employ surface topographical properties to represent hydrologic linkages between morphological units in a drainage basin. We show that these models may provide a limited, and possibly incorrect, view of streamflow generation processes, based on measurements in a small forested basin on the Canadian Shield in south-central Ontario. Variability of soil thickness was a first-order control on the ability of slope elements to deliver runoff to the basin's riparian zone, such that slopes with average soil thicknesses <0.2 m consistently produced runoff once depression storage on the bedrock surface was satisfied. The interaction between event size, depth of groundwater held in bedrock depressions, and the degree of hydrologic coupling between these groundwater pockets controlled runoff contributions from slope elements with thicker soil cover as well as groundwater dynamics in the riparian zone. The latter dictated whether slope runoff contributed to basin-scale stormflow. The basin exhibits a relatively minor divergence between surface and bedrock topography; nevertheless, the major control that spatial variations in soil thickness exert on streamflow generation means that such variations should be considered in hydroecological monitoring and modeling studies in this landscape.

[1]  K. Devito,et al.  SULPHATE DYNAMICS IN RELATION TO GROUNDWATER–SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS IN HEADWATER WETLANDS OF THE SOUTHERN CANADIAN SHIELD , 1997 .

[2]  Helmut Elsenbeer,et al.  Pedotransfer functions for estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity: implications for modeling storm flow generation , 2001 .

[3]  J. Buttle,et al.  Nitrogen chemistry of subsurface storm runoff on forested Canadian Shield hillslopes , 1999 .

[4]  J. Buttle,et al.  Spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity in shallow macroporous soils in a forested basin , 1997 .

[5]  J. Buttle,et al.  Runoff processes on a forested slope on the Canadian shield , 1999 .

[6]  Nigel T. Roulet,et al.  The baseflow and storm flow hydrology of a precambrian shield headwater peatland , 1998 .

[7]  Peter J. Dillon,et al.  Model of Sulphate Concentration in a Small Stream in the Harp Lake Catchment, Ontario , 1985 .

[8]  A. J. Neary,et al.  Throughfall and stemflow chemistry under deciduous and coniferous forest canopies in south-central Ontario , 1994 .

[9]  Keith Beven,et al.  On hypothesis testing in hydrology , 2001 .

[10]  J. Buttle,et al.  Runoff Production in a Forested, Shallow Soil, Canadian Shield Basin , 1995 .

[11]  Peter J. Dillon,et al.  The influence of hydrologic conditions and peat oxia on the phosphorus and nitrogen dynamics of a conifer swamp , 1993 .

[12]  Younes Alila,et al.  Using numerical modelling to address hydrologic forest management issues in British Columbia , 2001 .

[13]  L. Band,et al.  Simulating the impact of road construction and forest harvesting on hydrologic response , 2001 .

[14]  Keith Beven,et al.  APPLICATION OF A GENERALIZED TOPMODEL TO THE SMALL RINGELBACH CATCHMENT, VOSGES, FRANCE , 1996 .

[15]  David M. Wolock,et al.  SIMULATING THE VARIABLE-SOURCE-AREA CONCEPT OF STREAMFLOW GENERATION WITH THE WATERSHED MODEL TOPMODEL , 1993 .

[16]  Keith Beven,et al.  Including spatially variable effective soil depths in TOPMODEL , 1997 .

[17]  M. Woo,et al.  Hydrology of subarctic Canadian shield: bedrock upland , 2002 .

[18]  Kevin Devito,et al.  Groundwater-surface water interactions in headwater forested wetlands of the Canadian Shield , 1996 .

[19]  J. Buttle,et al.  Soil macroporosity and infiltration characteristics of a forest podzol. , 2000 .

[20]  K. Devito Sulphate mass balances of Precambrian Shield wetlands; the influence of catchment hydrogeology , 1995 .

[21]  Brian L. McGlynn,et al.  A review of the evolving perceptual model of hillslope flowpaths at the Maimai catchments, New Zealand , 2002 .

[22]  P. Dillon,et al.  Climate effects on sulphate flux from forested catchments in south-central Ontario , 2002 .

[23]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Hydrologic Processes in a Low-Gradient Source Area , 1995 .

[24]  M. Bonell Runoff generation in tropical forests , 2005 .

[25]  J. Buttle,et al.  Soil partitioning and surface store controls on spring runoff from a boreal forest peatland basin in north‐central Manitoba, Canada , 2001 .

[26]  J. Hewlett Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas , 1967 .

[27]  K. Beven,et al.  Toward a generalization of the TOPMODEL concepts:Topographic indices of hydrological similarity , 1996 .

[28]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[29]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hydrological processes—Letters. Topographic controls on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchmetns , 1997 .

[30]  Keith Beven,et al.  TOPMODEL : a critique. , 1997 .

[31]  James M. Buttle,et al.  Coupled vertical and lateral preferential flow on a forested slope , 2002 .

[32]  M. A. Kohler,et al.  Hydrology for engineers , 1958 .

[33]  N. Roulet,et al.  Runoff generation in zero‐order precambrian shield catchments: The stormflow response of a heterogeneous landscape , 1994 .

[34]  Malcolm G. Anderson,et al.  Advances in Hillslope Processes , 1996 .

[35]  H. Nesbitt,et al.  Formation and evolution of soils from an acidified watershed: Plastic Lake, Ontario, Canada , 1991 .

[36]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  Hydrological pathways and water chemistry in Amazonian rain forests. , 1996 .

[37]  A. Heyes,et al.  The hydrology and methylmercury dynamics of a Precambrian shield headwater peatland , 1996 .