Exploring Factors That Affect Teleconsultation Adoption: In The Case Of Malaysia

This study identifies the factors that could affect the adoption of teleconsultation technology in public hospitals in Malaysia from the qualitative standpoint. Based on theory-driven and prior-research approach, a conceptual framework was developed and used to facilitate the data collection and analysis processes. The underlying framework derived from a consideration of integrated model of established technology acceptance and diffusion theories and also findings of published telemedicine studies. Semi-structured interviews involving twenty eight key informants coupled with reviews of relevant documents were conducted within eleven participating hospitals to examine the key issues addressed in the framework which subsequently entailed thematic analysis. A summary of six themes and sub-themes drawn upon a priori issues appeared from the patterning of the responses were found to be of great importance in describing teleconsultation adoption phenomenon in Malaysia. Most respondents perceived teleconsultation as beneficial and useful for delivering health services. However the central issues appeared to be more focused on the actual need for the technology, perceived trust in technology and subsistence of facilitating conditions in explaining the way teleconsultation is utilized, suggesting more rigorous research should be conducted to uncover and acknowledge the actionable factors that potentially influence teleconsultation and health information technology adoption.

[1]  Michael Rigby,et al.  Telemedicine/telehealth: an international perspective. The diffusion of telemedicine. , 2002, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[2]  José Manuel Ortega Egea,et al.  Explaining physicians' acceptance of EHCR systems: An extension of TAM with trust and risk factors , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Impact of telemedicine must be defined in developing countries , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Rolf Wynn,et al.  Characteristics of successfully implemented telemedical applications , 2007, Implementation science : IS.

[5]  Davide Nicolini The work to make telemedicine work: a social and articulative view. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[8]  Nabeel A. Y. Al-Qirim,et al.  Championing telemedicine adoption and utilization in healthcare organizations in New Zealand , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al.  An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[12]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Adoption of Telemedicine Technology by Health Care Organizations: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[13]  H C Triandis,et al.  Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[14]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[15]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  M. Gagnon,et al.  Telehealth adoption in hospitals: an organisational perspective. , 2005, Journal of health organization and management.

[19]  Human and Organizational Dynamics in e-Health , 2005 .

[20]  Robert Y. Cavana,et al.  Applied Business research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods , 2001 .

[21]  Marc Berg,et al.  Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  B Stanberry,et al.  Legal and ethical aspects of telemedicine , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  Kristi Jackson,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo , 2007 .

[24]  N. Maarop,et al.  A review of telemedicine in developing countries: introduction and implementation issues , 2009 .

[25]  Paul Miller,et al.  Evaluating telemedicine in an accident and emergency setting , 2001, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[26]  Brian M. Kleiner,et al.  Empirically understanding trust in medical technology , 2009 .

[27]  Carol Grbich,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction , 2007 .

[28]  P Yellowlees,et al.  Successful development of telemedicine systems-seven core principles , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[29]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[30]  Stuart M. Speedie,et al.  Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[31]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[32]  Tom H. F. Broens,et al.  Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[33]  Pamela Whitten,et al.  Success and failure: a case study of two rural telemedicine projects , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[34]  Thomas R. Lindlof Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .