Estimation of utilities for the effects of depression from the SF-12.

BACKGROUND Utilities for health conditions, including major depressive disorder, have a theoretical relationship to health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Because of the complexity of utility measurement and the existence of large numbers of completed studies with HRQOL data but not utility data, it would be desirable to be able to estimate utilities from measurements of HRQOL. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to estimate utility for remission in major depression by use of information on associated variation in Short Form 12 (SF-12) scores. DESIGN A mapping function for SF-12 scores (based on a 6-health-state model with patient-weighted preferences) was applied to longitudinal data from a large naturalistic study to estimate changes in utilities. SUBJECTS Preference ratings for states were performed in a convenience sample of depressed primary care patients (n = 140). Outcomes were evaluated in patients in the Course of Depression Study (n = 295) with a DSM III diagnosis of depression at the onset of the study. MEASURES From clinical interview data, differences in utilities and global physical and mental health-related quality of life at 1- and 2-year follow-up were compared for patients who did and did not experience remission as determined by the Course of Depression Interview. RESULTS Remission of depression resulted in health status improvement, as measured by the SF-12, equivalent to a gain of 0.11 quality-adjusted life-years over 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Utilities for changes in health status, associated with a clinical change in depression, can be modeled from the SF-12 scales, which results in utilities within the range of estimates described in the literature.

[1]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  Functioning and utility for current health of patients with depression or chronic medical conditions in managed, primary care practices. , 1999, Archives of general psychiatry.

[2]  L A Lenert,et al.  Effects on Preferences of Violations of Procedural Invariance , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  L A Lenert,et al.  Associations between health status and utilities implications for policy. , 1999, Medical care.

[4]  K. Wells The design of Partners in Care: evaluating the cost-effectiveness of improving care for depression in primary care , 1999, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[5]  J. Brazier,et al.  Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  Catherine A. Sugar,et al.  Empirically defined health states for depression from the SF-12. , 1998, Health services research.

[7]  D. Revicki,et al.  SF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct? , 1998, Medical care.

[8]  D A Revicki,et al.  Patient-assigned health state utilities for depression-related outcomes: differences by depression severity and antidepressant medications. , 1998, Journal of affective disorders.

[9]  T. Patterson,et al.  Preliminary longitudinal assessment of quality of life in patients with major depression. , 1997, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[10]  L. Lenert,et al.  Variation among quality-of-life surveys. Theory and practice. , 1996, Medical care.

[11]  D. Bloch,et al.  Eliminating language barriers for non-English-speaking patients. , 1996, Medical care.

[12]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[13]  R. Klein,et al.  The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  K. Wells,et al.  The course of depression in adult outpatients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1992, Archives of general psychiatry.

[15]  A. Stewart,et al.  Methods of Sampling , 1992 .

[16]  A. Stewart,et al.  Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach , 1992 .