Optimisation design of reinforced S-shaped frame structure under axial dynamic loading

For S-shaped frame structures (SFSs) in vehicle body, the multi-diagonal reinforced frame (MRF) might bring higher energy absorption than the single-diagonal reinforced frame (SRF). However, the complicated structure of the MRF leads to the requirement of trade-off for multi-geometrical parameters in crashworthiness design. This paper presents a systemic methodology of optimisation design of reinforced SFS under axial dynamic loading. First, the finite element analysis of the crash behaviour and the energy absorption characteristics of the MRF and the SRF are implemented. Based on the numerical results, it can be found that the specific energy absorption (SEA) of the MRF is about 22% higher than that of the SRF, and the peak crushing force (PCF) of the MRF is reduced by 12% by comparing with the SRF. The simulations show the fact that the thickness of inner stiffener and the thickness of wall frame play significant effects on the SEA and the PCF. Second, a systemic methodology of optimisation design of reinforced SFS under axial dynamic loading is developed. The multi-objective optimisation design is performed by adopting multi-objective practice swarm optimisation (MOPSO) algorithm to achieve maximum SEA capacity and minimum PCF. During the multi-objective design (MOD) process, the response surface method (RSM) is utilised to improve computational efficiency for the complicated design problem in practical engineering. Finally, the optimisation results show the potential advantages of multi-diagonal reinforced frame (MRF) and the proposed method of optimisation design guarantees the feasibility of this type of reinforced SFSs used in passenger vehicles.

[1]  Heung-Soo Kim,et al.  New extruded multi-cell aluminum profile for maximum crash energy absorption and weight efficiency , 2002 .

[2]  Qing Li,et al.  Optimization of foam-filled bitubal structures for crashworthiness criteria , 2012 .

[3]  Masanori Mizuno,et al.  Collapse of Thin-Walled Curved Beam with Closed-Hat Section - Part 2: Simulation by Plane Plastic Hinge Model , 1990 .

[4]  H. Zarei,et al.  Crashworthiness optimization of empty and filled aluminum crash boxes , 2007 .

[5]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies of foam-filled sections , 2000 .

[6]  Xu Han,et al.  Multiobjective optimization for tapered circular tubes , 2011 .

[7]  Larsgunnar Nilsson,et al.  Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization , 2006 .

[8]  Heung-Soo Kim,et al.  Effect of the cross-sectional shape of hat-type cross-sections on crash resistance of an “S”-frame , 2001 .

[9]  Ahmed Elmarakbi,et al.  Crash analysis and energy absorption characteristics of S-shaped longitudinal members , 2013 .

[10]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  An Overview of the Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments for Sensitivity Analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Wei Li,et al.  Crashworthiness design for foam filled thin-wall structures , 2009 .

[12]  Qian Wang,et al.  Modeling and optimization of foam-filled thin-walled columns for crashworthiness designs , 2010 .

[13]  Tomasz Wierzbicki,et al.  Weight and crash optimization of foam-filled three-dimensional “S” frame , 2002 .

[14]  Wei Li,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of multi-cell sections for the crashworthiness design , 2008 .

[15]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization , 2007, DAC 2006.

[16]  H. R. Zarei,et al.  Optimization of the foam-filled aluminum tubes for crush box application , 2008 .

[17]  Yoshiaki Ohkami,et al.  Collapse of Thin-Walled Curved Beam with Closed-Hat Section - Part 1: Study on Collapse Characteristics , 1990 .

[18]  Hasan Kurtaran,et al.  Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations , 2002 .

[19]  Zhiliang Tang,et al.  Comparisons of honeycomb sandwich and foam-filled cylindrical columns under axial crushing loads , 2011 .

[20]  Anil Saigal,et al.  Crash behavior of a 3D S-shape space frame structure , 2007 .