The role of semantic knowledge in retrieval from episodic long-term memories: Implications for a model of retrieval

Two experiments were conducted, using a paired-associate recall reaction time paradigm, to assess the role semantic knowledge plays in retrieval of long-term episodic memories. In Experiment I, word frequency and meaningfulness were manipulated; high-frequency stimuli led to significantly longer reaction times, while meaningfulness had no significant effect. In Experiment II, the role of the distribution of preexperimental associates of the stimulus was further investigated by comparing retrieval time when the stimulus had either a high- or low-strength primary associate; the former resulted in longer reaction times. The implications of these results for a model of retrieval were discussed. Exhaustive search models were found inadequate, but viable parallel and serial self-terminating models were developed. In both of these models, retrieval time is a function of strength of the correct associate, relative to total strength of a restricted set of semantic associates of the stimulus.

[1]  J. Townsend.  SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[2]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity , 1974 .

[3]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Episodic memory: When recognition fails. , 1975 .

[4]  D. Griffith,et al.  The attentional demands of mnemonic control processes , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Jane Perlmutter,et al.  Retrieval processes in recall , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display , 1969 .

[7]  Evaluation of a model relating Thorndike-Lorge frequency and m to learning. , 1969 .

[8]  Shapiro Si.  Paired-associate response latencies as a function of free association strength. , 1968 .

[9]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[10]  J. L. Myers.  Fundamentals of Experimental Design , 1972 .

[11]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .

[12]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Dewey Rundus,et al.  Negative effects of using list items as recall cues , 1973 .

[14]  B. Underwood,et al.  Critical issues in interference theory , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[15]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[16]  L. Postman.  THE CALIFORNIA NORMS: ASSOCIATION AS A FUNCTION OF WORD FREQUENCY , 1970 .

[17]  John Theios,et al.  Reaction Time Measurements in the Study of Memory Processes: Theory and Data1 , 1973 .

[18]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[19]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Interference with real world knowledge , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  E. Saltz.  Thorndike-Lorge frequency and m of stimuli as separate factors in paired-associates learning. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.