Delay of reinforcers in a concurrent-chain schedule: An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Commons. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value , 2013 .
[2] E. Fantino,et al. A molecular analysis of choice on concurrent-chains schedules. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[3] M. Davison,et al. Some aspects of preference between immediate and delayed periods of reinforcement. , 1986 .
[4] J. E. Mazur. Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[5] J. E. Mazur,et al. Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[6] M. Davison,et al. Stimulus discriminability, contingency discriminability, and schedule performance , 1985 .
[7] J. E. Mazur. Tests of an equivalence rule for fixed and variable reinforcer delays. , 1984 .
[8] W. R. Poniewaz. Effects on preference of reinforcement delay, number of reinforcers, and terminal-link duration. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[9] E Fantino,et al. Choice: Some quantitative relations. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[10] R. Shull,et al. Delay or rate of food delivery as determiners of response rate. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[11] W M Baum,et al. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[12] M C Davison,et al. Preference for fixed-interval schedules: effects of initial-link length. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[13] M C Davison,et al. Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[14] E Fantino,et al. Relative delay of reinforcement and choice. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[15] D Macewen,et al. The effects of terminal-link fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules on responding under concurrent chained schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[16] Edmund Fantino,et al. CHOICE FOR PERIODIC SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1 , 1970 .
[17] D. Stubbs,et al. Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[18] E. Fantino. Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[19] M. Davison,et al. Reinforcement rate and immediacy of reinforcement as factors in choice , 1968 .
[20] G. S. Reynolds,et al. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[21] M. L. Chambers,et al. Nonparametric Trend Analysis , 1967 .
[22] J. E. Mazur. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .
[23] M. Marr,et al. Choice and reinforcement delay. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[24] E. Fantino,et al. Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[25] Edmund Fantino,et al. Recent Developments In Choice , 1974, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.
[26] N Squires,et al. A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[27] E. Fantino,et al. Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement. , 1970, Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
[28] R. Gnanadesikan,et al. Nonparametric Trend Analysis. A Practical Guide for Research Workers , 1965 .